From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752380AbaLOQAj (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:00:39 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]:54057 "EHLO mail-qa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750863AbaLOQAh (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:00:37 -0500 Message-ID: <548F0538.2080003@vanguardiasur.com.ar> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:58:48 -0300 From: Ezequiel Garcia Organization: VanguardiaSur User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Weinberger , dedekind1@gmail.com CC: dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =?windows-1252?Q?Guido_Mart=EDnez?= Subject: Re: UBI: Add support for scatter gather and blk-mq References: <1416845080-16663-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <548D85F1.5080606@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <548E0E7B.1000008@nod.at> In-Reply-To: <548E0E7B.1000008@nod.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/14/2014 07:26 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 14.12.2014 um 13:43 schrieb Ezequiel Garcia: >> Hey Richard, >> >> On 11/24/2014 01:04 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> This two patches implement blk-mq support for the UBI block driver. >>> As the scatter gather part is rather generic I've moved it directl >>> into UBI such that it can be reused later. >>> So far only reading data into a scatter gather list is possible. >>> After implementing ubi_eba_read_leb_sg() we could slowly start >>> removing a bunch of vmalloc() from the UBI core code and use scatter gather. >>> This should lower the memory footprint of UBI. >>> >>> [PATCH 1/2] UBI: Add initial support for scatter gather >>> [PATCH 2/2] UBI: Block: Add blk-mq support >>> >> >> Tried to apply these to take a look and run some tests, but 2/2 got >> rejected. Which tag did you base them? >> > > As discussed on IRC, blk-mq saw an update in -next. > The interface as changed bit, I've adopted my patches and pushed them to: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/misc.git ubiblock-mq > This tree is linux-ubifs.git plus linux-block.git for-next. > Great. > I'll resend this updated patches after the merge window has closed. > Happy testing. :-) > Thanks for the update :) -- Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar