mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@deferred.io>, LKP <lkp@01.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [sched] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1439 warn_pre_alternatives()
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:51:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54943B6A.9050309@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141210232645.GD24163@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>

Hi Fengguang,

On 11/12/14 00:26, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Dietmar,
>
> FYI, here is another bisect result.

thanks for testing this on another arch then ARM!

The problem is that the weak arch_scale_cpu_capacity calls 
default_scale_cpu_capacity on a system which doesn't overwrite it and 
the default one accesses the sched_domain which is not allocated that 
early when called by scheduler_tick.

I only tested it on an ARM system which in this tree which overwrites 
arch_scale_cpu_capacity and does not access sched_domain.

Have to look into it and will test the default case from now on too.

-- Dietmar

>
> https://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git eas-next
> commit 1fadb581b0be9420b143e43ff2f4a07ea7e45f6c
> Author:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> AuthorDate: Tue Dec 2 14:06:24 2014 +0000
> Commit:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@deferred.io>
> CommitDate: Tue Dec 9 20:33:17 2014 -0800
>
>      sched: Make usage and load tracking cpu scale-invariant
>
>      Besides the existing frequency scale-invariance correction factor, apply
>      cpu scale-invariance correction factor to usage and load tracking.
>
>      Cpu scale-invariance takes cpu performance deviations due to
>      micro-architectural differences (i.e. instructions per seconds) between
>      cpus in HMP systems (e.g. big.LITTLE) and differences in the frequency
>      value of the highest OPP between cpus in SMP systems into consideration.
>
>      Each segment of the sched_avg::{running_avg_sum, runnable_avg_sum}
>      geometric series is now scaled by the cpu performance factor too so the
>      sched_avg::{utilization_avg_contrib, load_avg_contrib} of each entity will
>      be invariant from the particular cpu of the HMP/SMP system it is gathered
>      on. As a result, cfs_rq::runnable_load_avg which is the sum of
>      sched_avg::load_avg_contrib, becomes cpu scale-invariant too.
>
>      So the {usage, load} level that is returned by {get_cpu_usage,
>      weighted_cpuload} stays relative to the max cpu performance of the system.
>
>      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>      Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
>

[...]



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-19 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-10 23:20 [sched] BUG: unable to handle kernel Fengguang Wu
2014-12-10 23:26 ` [sched] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1439 warn_pre_alternatives() Fengguang Wu
2014-12-10 23:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-12-19 14:51   ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2014-12-10 23:31 ` [sched] Initramfs unpacking failed: junk in compressed archive Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54943B6A.9050309@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=mturquette@deferred.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome