From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] timer: upper bound on loops of __run_timers processing
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:05:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A313A0.7050807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141230195228.GA3057@amt.cnet>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/30/2014 02:52 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Commit "timers: do not raise softirq unconditionally", allows for
> timer wheel processing (__run_timers) to be delayed for long
> periods of time.
>
> The effect is that
>
> loops = jiffies - base->timer_jiffies
>
> Can grow to very large values resulting in __run_timers taking
> hundreds of milliseconds to execute.
>
> Fix by creating an upper bound on the number of loops to be
> processed. This allows a nohz=off kernel to achieve desired
> latencies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c index f59e18c..c128416
> 100644 --- a/kernel/timer.c +++ b/kernel/timer.c @@ -1488,6
> +1488,12 @@ void run_local_timers(void) } #endif
>
> + if (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->timer_jiffies)) { + unsigned
> long jiffies_delta = jiffies - base->timer_jiffies; + if
> (jiffies_delta > TVR_SIZE) + raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ); + }
It certainly looks like cascading the timers over and over and
over again could be a lot of work.
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
- --
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUoxOfAAoJEM553pKExN6DO+0H/i2TXS2DJ6cObGZytYhsRz/U
4oqH4eCjwK5JczFMsyoUh/kXIkEQukMudj74katoP0TARlcnZF2G+R/Hj4XccCpz
X84DI7SCFZIwl3gpiuOoR81mosd1VkLBouwYj1Aglt+5Sh63yq91lreX20Tw/swF
jlorAWAAblQdt2zC5smjtbbhfKMuPC8qJFGoiGmLLPC/1l9XmGmfymB2WfN8IZm4
DrqAlCSm8+xxGdwUwAZTuHuHX15VOpGuUuEV2E8BM+6G93HI8iJe5E7g5hRymcNp
NPCe+BFgZ9AxHqNokC1cSWrqaS3koBbTJRDKAqxSEptmYQMZ/a61ydYJQmBtImw=
=uqAv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-30 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-30 19:52 Marcelo Tosatti
2014-12-30 21:05 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-01-14 17:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-01-14 17:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-26 21:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-02-17 17:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-17 23:08 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54A313A0.7050807@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=clark.williams@gmail.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome