From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <JGross@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen: use correct type for physical addresses
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:10:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AFEF78.8050603@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AFDE2B0200007800053248@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 09/01/15 12:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 09.01.15 at 13:51, <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 09/01/15 09:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 08.01.15 at 18:01, <JGross@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> @@ -284,7 +286,7 @@ static void __init xen_update_mem_tables(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long mfn)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* Update kernel mapping, but not for highmem. */
>>>> - if ((pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) >= __pa(high_memory))
>>>> + if (PFN_PHYS(pfn) >= (u64)(__pa(high_memory)))
>>>
>>> I don't think you really need the cast on the right side - __pa()
>>> should be returning a value of suitable type (and unsigned long
>>> would be sufficient for anything up to and including high_memory).
>>
>> I'd prefer:
>>
>> if (pfn >= PFN_DOWN(__pa(high_memory))
>
> Even better indeed. Just one more point: Strictly speaking
> __pa(high_memory) is invalid, as __pa() is defined for low
> memory only. Hence perhaps PFN_UP(__pa(high_memory - 1))?
Yes.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-08 17:01 [PATCH 0/3] xen: correct several bugs in new p2m list setup Juergen Gross
2015-01-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen: correct error for building p2m list on 32 bits Juergen Gross
2015-01-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen: correct race in alloc_p2m_pmd() Juergen Gross
2015-01-09 15:09 ` David Vrabel
2015-01-09 15:17 ` Juergen Gross
2015-01-08 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen: use correct type for physical addresses Juergen Gross
2015-01-09 9:57 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2015-01-09 12:51 ` David Vrabel
2015-01-09 12:56 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-09 15:10 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2015-01-09 12:51 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AFEF78.8050603@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=JGross@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome