From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
matt.fleming@intel.com, bp@suse.de, pbonzini@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, luto@amacapital.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] x86,fpu: move __thread_fpu_begin to when the task has the fpu
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:37:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B549E2.3040303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150113152430.GB23134@redhat.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/2015 10:24 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/11, riel@redhat.com wrote:
>>
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h +++
>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h @@ -420,7 +420,6 @@ static
>> inline void switch_fpu_prepare(struct task_struct *old, struct
>> task_struc if (preload) { new->thread.fpu_counter++;
>> set_thread_flag(TIF_LOAD_FPU); - __thread_set_has_fpu(new);
>> prefetch(new->thread.fpu.state); } else if (!use_eager_fpu())
>> stts(); @@ -436,7 +435,6 @@ static inline void
>> switch_fpu_prepare(struct task_struct *old, struct task_struc
>> prefetch(new->thread.fpu.state); set_thread_flag(TIF_LOAD_FPU);
>> } - __thread_fpu_begin(new); } /* else: CR0.TS is still set
>> from a previous FPU switch */ } @@ -451,6 +449,7 @@ static inline
>> void switch_fpu_prepare(struct task_struct *old, struct
>> task_struc static inline void switch_fpu_finish(struct
>> task_struct *new) { if (test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_LOAD_FPU))
>> { + __thread_fpu_begin(new); if
>> (unlikely(restore_fpu_checking(new))) drop_init_fpu(new); }
>
> Then perhaps it makes sense to move fpu_lazy_restore() to
> fpu_finish() too ?
I do that later in the series. I would like to keep that in a
separate changeset, for bisecting reasons.
> Either way, afaics we do not need use_eager_fpu() before
> fpu_lazy_restore(), and this reminds me that every use_eager_fpu()
> check in switch_fpu_prepare() looks confusing.
Agreed. The patch that moves fpu_lazy_restore() into
switch_fpu_finish() also removes the use_eager_fpu()
condition for that.
Another reason for it to be by itself in its own
changeset :)
- --
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUtUniAAoJEM553pKExN6D1KkH/0jJaxlbXBWdx3XRx3KczPiH
DJzWhUanmEZzFdCuyK/V8zDI0OjDorOntTTrA3rg1StBYGYgAm3hPMiVB5YvDJ8e
8YeJ9R+5FhMxqgBSKLHIGOazOjYCCAbl/9F+uTDnkOlsyRvJiNAVuURFdeXeWPx9
2tr2PoTVyPZlfIzVHDZKke1aeN1nS5m8Dlww3Wi1NTNJaDiKcguIMvfFtMc8j6BG
NRezcbEr+4UfQbV/k6JbMdS79Svq3xg9gWNx5BRZtv6eh4ycC8BMIICSUFYh5LAm
HfCRvWZYN+mvykaGfxYnmONrdT2TXyivy0YOeyIbCOi0hx0q52XoNKA6JwBePeA=
=wEv+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-13 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-11 21:46 [RFC PATCH 0/11 BROKEN] move FPU context loading to userspace switch riel
2015-01-11 21:46 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] x86,fpu: document the data structures a little riel
2015-01-12 21:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-12 21:38 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-12 21:52 ` Dave Hansen
2015-01-13 15:59 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-11 21:46 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] x86,fpu: replace fpu_switch_t with a thread flag riel
2015-01-13 15:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-13 16:35 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-13 16:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-11 21:46 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] x86,fpu: move __thread_fpu_begin to when the task has the fpu riel
2015-01-13 15:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-13 16:37 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-01-11 21:46 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] x86,fpu: defer FPU restore until return to userspace riel
2015-01-13 15:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-13 17:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-13 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-13 17:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-13 17:44 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-13 17:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-13 18:13 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-13 18:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-13 17:54 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-13 18:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-13 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-13 20:06 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-14 17:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-13 17:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-13 19:32 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-11 21:46 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] x86,fpu: ensure FPU state is reloaded from memory if task is traced riel
2015-01-13 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-13 16:33 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-13 16:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-13 16:57 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-11 21:46 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] x86,fpu: lazily skip fpu restore with eager fpu mode, too riel
2015-01-13 17:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-13 20:43 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-14 18:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-15 2:49 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-15 19:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-11 21:46 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] x86,fpu: store current fpu pointer, instead of fpu_owner_task riel
2015-01-11 21:46 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] x86,fpu: restore user FPU state lazily after __kernel_fpu_end riel
2015-01-14 18:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-14 19:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-11 21:46 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] x86,fpu,kvm: keep vcpu FPU active as long as it is resident riel
2015-01-11 21:46 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] x86,fpu: fix fpu_copy to deal with not-loaded fpu riel
2015-01-11 21:46 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] (BROKEN) x86,fpu: broken signal handler stack setup riel
2015-01-15 19:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86, fpu: kernel_fpu_begin/end initial cleanups/fix Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-15 19:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, fpu: introduce per-cpu "bool in_kernel_fpu" Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-16 2:22 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-20 12:54 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86, fpu: Introduce per-cpu in_kernel_fpu state tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-15 19:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, fpu: don't abuse ->has_fpu in __kernel_fpu_{begin,end}() Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-16 2:27 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-16 15:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-16 16:07 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-20 12:55 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86, fpu: Don't abuse has_fpu in __kernel_fpu_begin /end() tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-15 19:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, fpu: fix math_state_restore() race with kernel_fpu_begin() Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-16 2:30 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-16 16:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-20 12:55 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86, fpu: Fix " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-19 18:51 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86, fpu: more eagerfpu cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-19 18:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, fpu: __kernel_fpu_begin() should clear fpu_owner_task even if use_eager_fpu() Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-20 14:15 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-20 18:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-03 11:27 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86/fpu: " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-19 18:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, fpu: always allow FPU in interrupt " Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-20 14:46 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-20 22:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-20 21:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-03 11:28 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86/fpu: Always " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-19 18:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, fpu: don't abuse FPU in kernel threads " Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-20 14:53 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-23 15:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-03 11:28 ` [tip:x86/fpu] x86/fpu: Don' t " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-20 12:10 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86, fpu: more eagerfpu cleanups Borislav Petkov
2015-02-20 13:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B549E2.3040303@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome