mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "Kamezawa Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"\"Ishimatsu, Yasuaki/石松 靖章\"" <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"Tang Chen" <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com" <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: update numa affinity info at node hotplug
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:47:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B5D8B4.7010708@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150113152224.GA2976@htj.dyndns.org>

On 01/13/2015 11:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:19:09PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> The Mapping of the *online* cpus to nodes is already maintained by numa code.
>>
>> What the workqueue needs is a special Mapping:
>> 	The Mapping of the *possible* cpus to nodes
>>
>> But this mapping (if the numa code maintain it) is a trouble:
>> 	"possible" implies the mapping is stable/constant/immutable, it is hard to
>> 	ensure it in the numa code.
>>
>> if mutability of this mapping is acceptable, we just move 20~40 LOC
>> of code from workqueue to numa code, all the other complexities
>> about it are still in workqueue.c.
> 
> Make numa code maintain the mapping to the best of its knowledge and
> invoke notification callbacks when it changes.  

The best of its knowledge is the physical onlined nodes and CPUs.
The cpu_present_mask can represent this knowledge. But it lacks of
the per-node cpu_present_mask and the notification callbacks.

> Even if that involves slightly more code, that's the right thing to do at this point.

Right, but in currently, the workqueue will be the only user, and I don't known
asking who to do it, so I may keep it in the workqueue.c.

> This puts the logic which is complicated by the fact that the mapping may
> change where it's caused not some random unrelated place.  


> It'd be
> awesome if somebody more familiar with the numa side can chime in and
> explain why this mapping change can't be avoided.

I'm also looking for someone answer it.

> 
> Thanks.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-14  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-16 16:36 [PATCH 0/2] workqueue: fix a bug when numa mapping is changed v4 Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: update numa affinity info at node hotplug Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-17  1:36   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-17  3:22     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-17  4:56       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-25 20:11         ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-13  7:19           ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-13 15:22             ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-14  2:47               ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2015-01-14  8:54                 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2 shit_A shit_B] workqueue: fix wq_numa bug Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-14  8:54                   ` [RFC PATCH 1/2 shit_A shit_B] workqueue: reset pool->node and unhash the pool when the node is offline Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-14  8:54                   ` [RFC PATCH 2/2 shit_A] workqueue: update wq_numa when cpu_present_mask changed Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-14  8:54                   ` [RFC PATCH 2/3 shit_B] workqueue: remove wq_numa_possible_cpumask Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-14  8:54                   ` [RFC PATCH 3/3 shit_B] workqueue: directly update attrs of pools when cpu hot[un]plug Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-16  5:22                   ` [RFC PATCH 0/2 shit_A shit_B] workqueue: fix wq_numa bug Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2015-01-16  8:04                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-23  6:13                   ` Izumi, Taku
2015-01-23  8:18                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-14 13:57                 ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: update numa affinity info at node hotplug Tejun Heo
2015-01-15  1:23                   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-16 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: update cpumask at CPU_ONLINE if necessary Kamezawa Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B5D8B4.7010708@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome