From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752780AbbATQUu (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:20:50 -0500 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:54036 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750737AbbATQUs (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:20:48 -0500 Message-ID: <54BE805A.3060300@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:20:42 -0700 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomeu Vizoso CC: "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , Javier Martinez Canillas , Dylan Reid , Simon Glass , Ulf Hansson , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , Thierry Reding , Alexandre Courbot , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] ARM: tegra: Use the generated pinmux data References: <1421338359-27467-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <1421338359-27467-3-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <54B7F7F7.1020202@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/20/2015 06:59 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 15 January 2015 at 18:25, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 01/15/2015 09:12 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> >>> Google has submitted a board config for the pinmux programming of the >>> Nyan Big board. Use the whole of it as it's generated to make it easier >>> to update as the configuration gets fixed in the future. >> >> >> Submitted to where? I assume you mean tegra-pinmux-scripts. I don't see a >> Nyan/Nyan-big configuration there yet. IIRC (and I might not) one was >> posted, but there were some review comments that aren't yet addressed? > > Yeah, that's what I meant by submitted. TTBOMK the v2 doesn't have any > comments pending of being addressed? There's a thread where you and Andrew are discussing the settings for a bunch of the pins, and the differences between Big and Blaze. It didn't seem to me that the resolution was that the V2 patch was fine as is, but perhaps that's what the thread meant! Either way, it'd be nice if Andrew or someone else from ChromeOS could give an acked-by/reviewed-by for the patch if it's OK as is. That way, I'll know it's good without any doubts.