From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754321AbbAUEVE (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:21:04 -0500 Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:15751 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752455AbbAUEVA (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:21:00 -0500 X-AuditID: cbfee68d-f79296d000004278-aa-54bf292a2e09 Message-id: <54BF2929.3090107@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:20:57 +0900 From: Chanwoo Choi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rob Herring , MyungJoo Ham , Kukjin Kim , Kyungmin Park , "Wysocki, Rafael J" , Mark Rutland , a.kesavan@samsung.com, Tomasz Figa , =?UTF-8?B?S3J6eXN6dG9mIEtvesWCb3dza2k=?= , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Rob Herring , InKi Dae , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/8] devfreq: exynos: Add documentation for generic exynos memory bus frequency driver References: <1420681257-3078-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <1420681257-3078-3-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <54BE108F.8090506@samsung.com> <54BE3E10.2080906@samsung.com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrPIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWyRsSkWFdLc3+IwcxZ7BaP1yxmstg4Yz2r xaT7E1gsXr8wtOh//JrZ4mzTG3aLTY+vsVpc3jWHzeJz7xFGixnn9zFZLL1+kcniduMKNovH K96yW7TuPcJu8f3bNzaLVbv+MFps/OrhIOixZt4aRo+ds+6yeyze85LJY9OqTjaPO9f2sHls XlLv0bdlFaPH501yARxRXDYpqTmZZalF+nYJXBm7bjaxFlxgq7jy0L2BcR1rFyMnh4SAicTl /auYIWwxiQv31rOB2EICSxkldnaHw9TM2TsdqIYLKL6IUWLzuiesEM5rRolvE2YBZTg4eAW0 JPZcLwMxWQRUJXrmGYD0sgFF97+4ATZTVCBMYuX0KywgNq+AoMSPyfdYQMpFgGpe3kwFmcgs MIFNouHHG7B6YYE8iVOPbkDtvcsscfXkOrAEp0CwxMxJ+8AeYBZQl5g0bxEzhC0vsXnNW7AG CYGlHBLvLk0AK2IREJD4NvkQ2DYJAVmJTQegHpaUOLjiBssERrFZSG6ahWTsLCRjFzAyr2IU TS1ILihOSi8y1CtOzC0uzUvXS87P3cQIjPfT/5717mC8fcD6EKMAB6MSD+8Lxf0hQqyJZcWV uYcYTYGumMgsJZqcD0wqeSXxhsZmRhamJqbGRuaWZkrivIpSP4OFBNITS1KzU1MLUovii0pz UosPMTJxcEo1MCoeb+dbWONnZXr94s0rljdFebdMKDok8pjns3P/Jp3dEyL/caxU0HfW/TZF +vfZMg7WlivbLS/t5y5M/H91lteXjsfz3eIXrfQv9Jv76s3qQ1dn7/3kNq1/qZ9F/wXG+5Ok BQ4sSmnMWvKI0W6baolB89WgI3o1hWbVYlcOOhcwPJHpiLyUtFCJpTgj0VCLuag4EQAliQ4B 8gIAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrFKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jAV1Nzf0hBsdmWVs8XrOYyWLjjPWs FpPuT2CxeP3C0KL/8Wtmi7NNb9gtNj2+xmpxedccNovPvUcYLWac38dksfT6RSaL240r2Cwe r3jLbtG69wi7xfdv39gsVu36w2ix8auHg6DHmnlrGD12zrrL7rF4z0smj02rOtk87lzbw+ax eUm9R9+WVYwenzfJBXBENTDaZKQmpqQWKaTmJeenZOal2yp5B8c7x5uaGRjqGlpamCsp5CXm ptoqufgE6Lpl5gB9oaRQlphTChQKSCwuVtK3wzQhNMRN1wKmMULXNyQIrsfIAA0krGHM2HWz ibXgAlvFlYfuDYzrWLsYOTkkBEwk5uydzgxhi0lcuLeerYuRi0NIYBGjxOZ1T1ghnNeMEt8m zAKq4uDgFdCS2HO9DMRkEVCV6JlnANLLBhTd/+IGG4gtKhAmsXL6FRYQm1dAUOLH5HssIOUi QDUvb6aCTGQWmMAm0fDjDVi9sECexKlHN5ghVt1llrh6ch1YglMgWGLmpH1ghzILqEtMmreI GcKWl9i85i3zBEaBWUh2zEJSNgtJ2QJG5lWMoqkFyQXFSem5hnrFibnFpXnpesn5uZsYwenk mdQOxpUNFocYBTgYlXh4XyjuDxFiTSwrrsw9xCjBwawkwqsoARTiTUmsrEotyo8vKs1JLT7E aAoMgYnMUqLJ+cBUl1cSb2hsYmZkaWRuaGFkbK4kzqtk3xYiJJCeWJKanZpakFoE08fEwSnV wHjR5P1/xr+pbtIG920n+a//eCGiZ1OaSJj4rzLXmNObQxWFlhhMYE7XeZWlH8D5K0fzRZyc UurfTVvEzE+kznpUKe99+WCkeY/18+Xy3U7x0RdX68Uost7+k57pe7fX85r12S0JzRX5HhbM S048iNIxu6YVlDyL+7hivKO4gm36FP84F8MSJZbijERDLeai4kQAVYXSnz0DAAA= DLP-Filter: Pass X-MTR: 20000000000000000@CPGS X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/21/2015 12:17 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 20 January 2015 at 17:07, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> If each bus-block has separate regulator independently, each bus-block can be registered >> separately. But, exynos bus-blocks in mem-bus-group share the same regulator. > > This can be managed easily within the driver. Just stay the highest > voltage requested. If the clock will be stayed on highest voltage, will reduce the considerable benefit of power-consumption. I think it is DFS instead of DVFS. Is it right? > I don't think its not manageable. But it will be much more convenient > as that will show > the correct picture and get rid of unnecessarily virtualizing things.. What is the correct picture? do you need more detailed explanation of Exynos memory bus structure? Thanks, Chanwoo