From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
rgb@redhat.com, sd@queasysnail.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Overhaul the audit filename handling
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:58:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C12C4A.5080108@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3252765.lrITUkIS9l@sifl>
On 01/22/2015 08:22 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 09:36:34 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 01/21/2015 08:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> This patchset has some important changes from the previous revision,
>>> namely a fix from Al Viro (included in 2/5) that resolves a boot panic
>>> on some systems as well as some smaller, less noteworthy fixes found
>>> in the linux-next announcement thread from January 20th (refcount bump
>>> in __audit_reusename() and a inode type in __audit_inode()).
>>>
>>> This patchset still needs some additional testing to verify that the
>>> audit code still functions properly (the minor fixes mentioned above)
>>> and there is an additional patch from Al that should be included as
>>> well, but I wanted to post this and push the series to the audit next
>>> branch quickly since a number of folks were affected by the boot panic.
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Paul Moore (5):
>>> fs: rework getname_kernel to handle up to PATH_MAX sized filenames
>>> fs: create proper filename objects using getname_kernel()
>>> audit: enable filename recording via getname_kernel()
>>> audit: fix filename matching in __audit_inode() and
>>> __audit_inode_child()
>>> audit: replace getname()/putname() hacks with reference counters
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> What is the baseline for this patch set ? Obviously -next won't work,
>> and it does not apply to mainline either.
>
> This patchset currently lives, along with one other unrelated patch, in the
> audit next branch:
>
> * git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/audit
>
> I'm currently testing these in combination with the patch Al posted last
> night. Assuming all goes well I'll drop them from the audit next branch and
> toss all six patches (these plus Al's) into another branch in case Al wants to
> pull them for the VFS tree.
>
The version in the audit next tree works with my qemu microblaze test,
so feel free to add
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-22 4:59 Paul Moore
2015-01-22 4:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] fs: rework getname_kernel to handle up to PATH_MAX sized filenames Paul Moore
2015-01-22 15:53 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-01-22 16:56 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-01-22 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] fs: create proper filename objects using getname_kernel() Paul Moore
2015-01-22 15:54 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-01-22 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] audit: enable filename recording via getname_kernel() Paul Moore
2015-01-22 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] audit: fix filename matching in __audit_inode() and __audit_inode_child() Paul Moore
2015-01-22 16:04 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-01-22 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] audit: replace getname()/putname() hacks with reference counters Paul Moore
2015-01-22 16:09 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-01-22 16:24 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-22 5:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Overhaul the audit filename handling Guenter Roeck
2015-01-22 7:54 ` Al Viro
2015-01-22 16:23 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-22 21:25 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-22 21:29 ` Al Viro
2015-01-22 21:40 ` Al Viro
2015-01-22 22:05 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-23 5:30 ` Al Viro
2015-01-23 16:15 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-24 9:03 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-01-24 22:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-26 15:52 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-22 17:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-01-22 16:22 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-22 16:58 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C12C4A.5080108@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome