From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757712AbbA0If0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 03:35:26 -0500 Received: from mail.emea.novell.com ([130.57.118.101]:36597 "EHLO mail.emea.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752579AbbA0IfY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 03:35:24 -0500 Message-Id: <54C75BD60200007800059BDD@mail.emea.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 14.0.1 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:35:18 +0000 From: "Jan Beulich" To: , "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: "Andy Lutomirski" , , "Masami Hiramatsu" , , "Thomas Gleixner" , , , , , "Ingo Molnar" , "Luis Rodriguez" , "Borislav Petkov" , , , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/xen: allow privcmd hypercalls to be preempted on 64-bit References: <1422323467-16713-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1422323467-16713-3-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> In-Reply-To: <1422323467-16713-3-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> On 27.01.15 at 02:51, wrote: Even if David told you this would be acceptable, I have to question an abstract model of fixing issues on only 64-bit kernels - this may be acceptable for distro purposes, but seems hardly the right approach for upstream. If 32-bit ones are to become deliberately broken, the XEN config option should become dependent on !X86_32. Jan