From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, <riel@redhat.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Avoid using uninitialized variable in preferred_group_nid()
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:46:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C9044B020000780005A5E6@mail.emea.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-81907478c4311a679849216abf723999184ab984@git.kernel.org>
>>> On 28.01.15 at 15:29, <tipbot@zytor.com> wrote:
> Commit-ID: 81907478c4311a679849216abf723999184ab984
> Gitweb:
> http://git.kernel.org/tip/81907478c4311a679849216abf723999184ab984
> Author: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> AuthorDate: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:25:38 +0000
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> CommitDate: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 13:14:12 +0100
>
> sched/fair: Avoid using uninitialized variable in preferred_group_nid()
>
> At least some gcc versions - validly afaict - warn about potentially
> using max_group uninitialized: There's no way the compiler can prove
> that the body of the conditional where it and max_faults get set/
> updated gets executed; in fact, without knowing all the details of
> other scheduler code, I can't prove this either.
>
> Generally the necessary change would appear to be to clear max_group
> prior to entering the inner loop, and break out of the outer loop when
> it ends up being all clear after the inner one. This, however, seems
> inefficient, and afaict the same effect can be achieved by exiting the
> outer loop when max_faults is still zero after the inner loop.
>
> [ mingo: changed the solution to zero initialization: uninitialized_var()
> needs to die, as it's an actively dangerous construct: if in the future
> a known-proven-good piece of code is changed to have a true, buggy
> uninitialized variable, the compiler warning is then supressed...
But you went farther than that: You also dropped the breaking
out of the outer loop. Yet that has - beyond the fixing of the bug
here - the desirable effect of not continuing for perhaps many
iterations when nothing new can ever be found anymore.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-28 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-23 8:25 sched/fair: avoid " Jan Beulich
2015-01-23 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 10:01 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-28 14:29 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Avoid " tip-bot for Jan Beulich
2015-01-28 14:46 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2015-01-28 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-09 8:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-09 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-09 11:41 ` Jan Beulich
2015-02-18 17:10 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Avoid some pointless iterations tip-bot for Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C9044B020000780005A5E6@mail.emea.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®