From: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>
To: "Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"dvhart@infradead.org" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:12:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54CA5BFC.5030301@nexus-software.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CA546B.3040704@nexus-software.ie>
On 29/01/15 15:40, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> It would be nice to have two variants (1) index based & (2) address
>> based.
>
> Understood. The direction from Ingo was to have address based external
> interface imr_del_range() and support an index based internal
> imr_clear() - internally.
>
> So - in order to get test coverage - I'll move the self-test code back
> into the main IMR code
>
> Not as pretty that way - but better coverage :)
Talking to myself in public...
Second (third) thought - there's no advantage to moving the test code
back in - since imr_add_range() won't return the index anymore...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-29 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-28 18:36 [PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Add IMR support to Quark/Galileo Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-01-28 18:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000 Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-01-29 5:38 ` Darren Hart
2015-01-29 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-01-29 10:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-29 10:12 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-01-29 13:47 ` Ong, Boon Leong
2015-01-29 15:22 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-01-29 15:32 ` Ong, Boon Leong
2015-01-29 15:40 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-01-29 16:12 ` Bryan O'Donoghue [this message]
2015-01-29 16:26 ` Ong, Boon Leong
2015-01-29 15:15 ` Ong, Boon Leong
2015-01-29 13:27 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-01-29 9:59 ` Ong, Boon Leong
2015-01-28 18:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, quark: Add Intel Quark platform support Bryan O'Donoghue
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-29 17:23 [PATCH 0/2] x86: Add IMR support to Quark/Galileo Bryan O'Donoghue
2014-12-29 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000 Bryan O'Donoghue
2014-12-31 15:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-01 20:11 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-01-06 7:36 ` Darren Hart
2015-01-06 13:43 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-01-06 16:54 ` Darren Hart
2015-01-07 23:45 ` Ong, Boon Leong
2015-01-08 12:10 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-01-08 14:52 ` Ong, Boon Leong
2015-01-08 0:04 ` Ong, Boon Leong
2015-01-08 13:08 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-01-08 14:45 ` Ong, Boon Leong
2015-01-08 15:11 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-01-09 3:44 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54CA5BFC.5030301@nexus-software.ie \
--to=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome