From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes/x86: Use the current code when modified by Kprobes using ftrace
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:40:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54CF37EA.50000@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422632700-4342-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz>
(2015/01/31 0:45), Petr Mladek wrote:
> can_probe() checks if the given address points to the beginning of
> an instruction. It analyzes all the instructions from the beginning
> of the function until the given address. The code might be modified
> by another Kprobe. In this case, the current code is read into a buffer,
> int3 breakpoint is replaced by the saved opcode in the buffer, and
> can_probe() analyzes the buffer instead.
>
> There is a bug that __recover_probed_insn() tries to restore
> the original code even for Kprobes using the ftrace framework.
> But in this case, the opcode is not stored. See the difference
> between arch_prepare_kprobe() and arch_prepare_kprobe_ftrace().
> The opcode is stored by arch_copy_kprobe() only from
> arch_prepare_kprobe().
Good catch!
> This patch makes Kprobe to use the current code when it is modified
> by ftrace. It is not the original one but it is a valid instruction
> of the same length. Therefore it is perfectly fine for the check.
Hmm, but there is a chance we can hit it in the period of replacing code.
This means we'll see 5byte nop but started with int3. (see P6_NOP5 in
arch/x86/include/asm/nops.h)
So, I think we'd better return a special buffer which has a 5byte NOP.
Thank you for reporting!
>
> Note that I found this problem when playing with Kprobes. I did it
> on x86_64 with gcc-4.8.3 that supported -mfentry. I modified
> samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c and added offset 5 to put
> the probe right after the fentry area:
>
> --- cut ---
> static struct kprobe kp = {
> .symbol_name = "do_fork",
> + .offset = 5,
> };
> --- cut ---
>
> Then I was able to load kprobe_example before jprobe_example
> but not the other way around:
>
> $> modprobe jprobe_example
> $> modprobe kprobe_example
> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'kprobe_example': Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide character
>
> It did not make much sense and debugging pointed to the bug
> described above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> index 98f654d466e5..ef321caae3ba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> @@ -225,8 +225,14 @@ __recover_probed_insn(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsigned long addr)
> struct kprobe *kp;
>
> kp = get_kprobe((void *)addr);
> - /* There is no probe, return original address */
> - if (!kp)
> + /*
> + * Use the current code if it is not modified by Kprobe
> + * or when the Kprobe is using ftrace. In the second case
> + * we do not have any information about the original code
> + * but it is not a problem. Ftrace has put there a valid
> + * instruction of the same length.
> + */
> + if (!kp || kprobe_ftrace(kp))
> return addr;
>
> /*
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-02 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-30 15:45 Petr Mladek
2015-02-02 8:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2015-02-02 14:57 ` Petr Mladek
2015-02-02 17:04 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54CF37EA.50000@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®