On 02/11/2015 04:43 PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb, at 02:17:03PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Feb, at 11:51:44AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>>> If you are Ok with this patch, could you please pickup it?
>> Applied, thanks Ivan!
> Btw this patch doesn't apply cleanly, the reject looks like this,
>
> --- drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> +++ drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> @@ -537,6 +543,8 @@
>   		dmi_ver &= 0xFFFFFF;

The problem is in above string.
I used linux next, but I had one patch before.
Sorry... just forgot about it.
I've attached the same patch but on top of linux_next,
it can be applied cleanly.
Sorry once again and thanks!

>   		dmi_len = get_unaligned_le32(buf + 12);
>   		dmi_base = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 16);
> +		smbios_header_size = buf[6];
> +		memcpy(smbios_header, buf, smbios_header_size);
>   
>   		/*
>   		 * The 64-bit SMBIOS 3.0 entry point no longer has a field
>
> What version of the kernel did you base this patch on? The conflict is
> trivial to fixup and I've done so and pushed it out on the EFI 'next'
> branch, but I wanted to call out this conflict explicitly.
>