mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] n_tty_read: check for hanging tty while waiting for input
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:35:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E3C21E.3000301@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150217215046.GC13666@redhat.com>

Hi Aristeu,

On 02/17/2015 04:50 PM, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 02/17/2015 04:06 PM, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
>>> If the console has a canonical reader and the respective tty hangs up,
>>> it'll waste a wake up and will never release the last ldisc reference so
>>> the hangup process can finish:
>>
>> This behavior is by-design; /dev/console cannot be hung-up.
> 
> hangup is issued on the tty that happens to be the console. In this
> case, ttyS0.

I realize that. But hanging up the tty that is /dev/console only affects
open descriptors that are not /dev/console.

So readers using the /dev/ttyS0 file descriptor will see a hungup fops,
but readers using /dev/console will not, and /dev/ttyS0 will _not_
be closed or released because of the still-open descriptor on /dev/console.

>> What process is sleeping on /dev/console read() and what is its controlling
>> tty? I ask because console teardown usually happens when SIGHUP is
>> received by the process group.
> 
> ttyS0 is the controller tty.

Ok, so the process sleeping on /dev/console read() should have received
SIGHUP, which would wake the process and cause it to exit the
n_tty_read() loop, thus dropping the ldisc reference it holds.
Did it ignore the signal or perhaps the signal is masked?

Of course, there is no requirement for the process sleeping on /dev/console
to respond to SIGHUP, in which case, the hangup simply fails to make
forward progress because of the open /dev/console descriptor.

Regards,
Peter Hurley


  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-17 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-17 21:06 Aristeu Rozanski
2015-02-17 21:28 ` Peter Hurley
2015-02-17 21:50   ` Aristeu Rozanski
2015-02-17 22:35     ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2015-02-18 14:58       ` Aristeu Rozanski
2015-02-18 15:40         ` Peter Hurley
2015-02-18 15:56           ` Aristeu Rozanski
2015-02-18 16:38             ` Peter Hurley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54E3C21E.3000301@hurleysoftware.com \
    --to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=aris@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome