From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757080AbbCCPfX (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:35:23 -0500 Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:47247 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756931AbbCCPfU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:35:20 -0500 Message-ID: <54F5D4B6.40409@arm.com> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:35:18 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" CC: Sudeep Holla , "nico@linaro.org" , "b.zolnierkie@samsung.com" , "kgene@kernel.org" , "a.kesavan@samsung.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Liviu Dudau , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Pawel Moll , "olof@lixom.net" , Punit Agrawal , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm-cci: Rearrange code for splitting PMU vs driver code References: <1425295754-13376-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <1425295754-13376-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <1425295754-13376-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2015 15:35:16.0416 (UTC) FILETIME=[A5E9CC00:01D055C7] X-MC-Unique: 115030315351902201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/03/15 11:29, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" > > No functional changes, only code re-arrangements for easier split of the > PMU code vs low level driver code. Extracts the port handling code > to cci_probe_ports(). > > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose > --- > drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 330 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 1 file changed, 168 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c > index 84fd660..f27cf56 100644 > --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c [...] > @@ -1395,11 +1412,36 @@ static int cci_probe(void) > sync_cache_w(&cpu_port); > __sync_cache_range_w(ports, sizeof(*ports) * nb_cci_ports); > pr_info("ARM CCI driver probed\n"); > + > return 0; > +} > + > +static int cci_probe(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + struct device_node *np; > + struct resource res; > + > + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arm_cci_matches); > + if (!np) > + return -ENODEV; > > -memalloc_err: > + if (!of_device_is_available(np)) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res); > + if (!ret) { > + cci_ctrl_base = ioremap(res.start, resource_size(&res)); > + cci_ctrl_phys = res.start; > + } > + if (ret || !cci_ctrl_base) { > + WARN(1, "unable to ioremap CCI ctrl\n"); > + ret = -ENXIO; > + goto out; IMO you can return directly here and get rid of this goto as nothing is done there. Regards, Sudeep