mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NMI watchdog triggering during load_balance
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:37:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F9F3D7.1030905@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425665511.7562.36.camel@gmx.de>

On 3/6/15 11:11 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> That was the question, _do_ you have any control, because that topology
> is toxic.  I guess your reply means 'nope'.
>
>> The system has 4 physical cpus (sockets). Each cpu has 32 cores with 8
>> threads per core and each cpu has 4 memory controllers.
>
> Thank god I've never met one of these, looks like the box from hell :)
>
>> If I disable SCHED_MC and CGROUPS_SCHED (group scheduling) there is a
>> noticeable improvement -- watchdog does not trigger and I do not get the
>> rq locks held for 2-3 seconds. But there is still fairly high cpu usage
>> for an idle system. Perhaps I should leave SCHED_MC on and disable
>> SCHED_SMT; I'll try that today.
>
> Well, if you disable SMT,your troubles _should_ shrink radically, as
> your box does. You should probably look at why you have CPU domains.
> You don't ever want to see that on a NUMA box.

In responding earlier today I realized that the topology is all wrong as 
you were pointing out. There should be 16 NUMA domains (4 memory 
controllers per socket and 4 sockets). There should be 8 sibling cores. 
I will look into why that is not getting setup properly and what we can 
do about fixing it.

--

But, I do not understand how the wrong topology is causing the NMI 
watchdog to trigger. In the end there are still N domains, M groups per 
domain and P cpus per group. Doesn't the balancing walk over all of them 
irrespective of physical topology?

Here's another data point that jelled this morning explaining the 
problem to someone: the NMI watchdog trips on a mass exit:

TPC: <_raw_spin_trylock_bh+0x38/0x100>
g0: 7fffffffffffffff g1: 00000000000000ff g2: 0000000000070f8c g3: 
fffe403b97891c98
g4: fffe803b963eda00 g5: 000000010036c000 g6: fffe803b84108000 g7: 
0000000000000093
o0: 0000000000000fe0 o1: 0000000000000fe0 o2: ffffff0000000000 o3: 
0000000000200200
o4: 0000000000a98080 o5: 0000000000000000 sp: fffe803b8410ada1 ret_pc: 
00000000006800dc
RPC: <cpumask_next_and+0x44/0x6c>
l0: 0000000000e9b114 l1: 0000000000000001 l2: 0000000000000001 l3: 
0000000000000005
l4: 0000000000002000 l5: fffe803b8410b990 l6: 0000000000000004 l7: 
0000000000f267b0
i0: 0000000100b10700 i1: 00000000ffffffff i2: 0000000101324d80 i3: 
fffe803b8410b6c0
i4: 0000000000000038 i5: 0000000000000498 i6: fffe803b8410ae51 i7: 
000000000045dc30
I7: <double_rq_lock+0x4c/0x68>
Call Trace:
  [000000000045dc30] double_rq_lock+0x4c/0x68
  [000000000046a23c] load_balance+0x278/0x740
  [00000000008aa178] __schedule+0x378/0x8e4
  [00000000008aab1c] schedule+0x68/0x78
  [00000000004718ac] do_exit+0x798/0x7c0
  [000000000047195c] do_group_exit+0x88/0xc0
  [0000000000481148] get_signal_to_deliver+0x3ec/0x4c8
  [000000000042cbc0] do_signal+0x70/0x5e4
  [000000000042d14c] do_notify_resume+0x18/0x50
  [00000000004049c4] __handle_signal+0xc/0x2c


For example the stream program has 1024 threads (1 for each CPU). If you 
ctrl-c the program or wait for it terminate that's when it trips. Other 
workloads that routinely trip it are make -j N, N some number (e.g., on 
a 256 cpu system 'make -j 128'), 10 seconds later oops stop that build, 
ctrl-c ... boom with the above stack trace.

Code wise ... and this is still present in 3.18 and 3.20:

schedule()
- __schedule()
   + irqs disabled: raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);

      pick_next_task
      - idle_balance()

   + irqs enabled:
     different task: context_switch(rq, prev, next)
                     --> finish_lock_switch eventually
     same task: raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock) or


For 2.6.39 it's the invocation of idle_balance which is triggering load 
balancing with IRQs disabled. That's when the NMI watchdog trips.

I'll pound on 3.18 and see if I can reproduce something similar there.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-06 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-06  4:05 David Ahern
2015-03-06  4:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-06 15:01   ` David Ahern
2015-03-06 18:11     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-06 18:37       ` David Ahern [this message]
2015-03-06 19:29         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-10  3:06           ` David Ahern
2015-03-07  9:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-06  8:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-06 15:03   ` David Ahern
2015-03-06  9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-06 15:10   ` David Ahern
2015-03-06  9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-06 15:12   ` David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54F9F3D7.1030905@oracle.com \
    --to=david.ahern@oracle.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome