From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751481AbdJSFcO (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 01:32:14 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:48368 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751125AbdJSFcL (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 01:32:11 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 22DEA600ED Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sricharan@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] remoteproc: qcom: Add support for mss remoteproc on msm8996 To: Bjorn Andersson , "Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)" Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org, agross@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org References: <1500634173-24416-1-git-send-email-akdwived@codeaurora.org> <1500634173-24416-5-git-send-email-akdwived@codeaurora.org> <20171012182052.GG1165@minitux> <20171016185804.GK1165@minitux> From: Sricharan R Message-ID: <54b18f4b-b399-d4aa-8ec3-1000004af445@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:02:05 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171016185804.GK1165@minitux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 171018-10, 10/19/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, On 10/17/2017 12:28 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon 16 Oct 06:19 PDT 2017, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote: >> On 10/12/2017 11:50 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > [..] >>> Please fix this and add my Acked-by >> Sure will do, just want to ask, when i am sending updated patches, should i >> sent all the 4 patches in series or should skip those which are acked by >> you. > > Please include all the patches in each submission (unless the maintainer > tells you that he/she applied some of them already). > > Make sure to add any "Acked-by", "Reviewed-by" and "Tested-by" on your > patches, so that people know that they are already reviewed/tested. > > > And finally, when resending patches, add a section between "---" and the > diff-stat describing changes since the last version - that makes it > easier to see what changed since last time and will help the reviewer > look at the "new" things. So i was having the ipq8074 q6 remoteproc support based on this series last time. With the msm8996 now getting cleared, i will rebase my patches and repost. Otherwise, just hope that you were ok with the approach [1]. [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1481961.html Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus