mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yan <rottled@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.22.6 - Discrepancy between running and on-disk kernels
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:51:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54b90fdf0803140751m71935a09r9b039ca6eb124f4d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

I have been trying to compare the code from the on-disk compressed kernel
that was booted and the running kernel extracted from /dev/kmem. I extracted
the kernel's code from the disk image by stripping the head.S and similar
and gunzipping it, and extracted the kernel from /dev/kmem by reading data
between _text and _etext symbol offsets.

I then ran both through a disassembler and diff'ed the outputs. Predictably,
the disassembly was similar, but not identical. Some instructions (e.g. bts)
had a 'lock' prefix, where as others had a 'nop' in its place.

There were other differences with some instructions like mfence. Everything
else matched just fine, the differences were mostly in memory-referencing
instructions.

My question is, what can be changing the kernel between being on static
storage and being loaded? Or am I just being fooled into thinking something
changed it? I'm thinking that it had something to do with mutex locking
and SMP, but I looked through boot code and tried googling and came up with
nothing. Another possibility is me interpreting non-instructions as
instructions.

Example:

The following pattern repeats a lot:

1325c1326,1327
<     1089: f0 0f b3 04 24          lock btr %eax,(%esp)
---
>     1089: 90                      nop
>     108a: 0f b3 04 24             btr    %eax,(%esp)

As well as other changes:

94383,94384c94832,94835
<    47bb3: f0 83 04 24 00          lock addl $0x0,(%esp)
<    47bb8: f0 ff 05 7c 30 80 c0    lock incl 0xc080307c
---
>    47bb3: 0f ae f0                mfence
>    47bb6: 89 f6                   mov    %esi,%esi
>    47bb8: 90                      nop
>    47bb9: ff 05 7c 30 80 c0       incl   0xc080307c


(I'm not subscribed; please cc any responses to me)

Thanks in advance,
Yan

             reply	other threads:[~2008-03-14 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-14 14:51 Yan [this message]
2008-03-14 16:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-14 16:08   ` Yan
2008-03-14 16:31     ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54b90fdf0803140751m71935a09r9b039ca6eb124f4d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rottled@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®