From: Yan <rottled@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.22.6 - Discrepancy between running and on-disk kernels
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:51:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54b90fdf0803140751m71935a09r9b039ca6eb124f4d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
I have been trying to compare the code from the on-disk compressed kernel
that was booted and the running kernel extracted from /dev/kmem. I extracted
the kernel's code from the disk image by stripping the head.S and similar
and gunzipping it, and extracted the kernel from /dev/kmem by reading data
between _text and _etext symbol offsets.
I then ran both through a disassembler and diff'ed the outputs. Predictably,
the disassembly was similar, but not identical. Some instructions (e.g. bts)
had a 'lock' prefix, where as others had a 'nop' in its place.
There were other differences with some instructions like mfence. Everything
else matched just fine, the differences were mostly in memory-referencing
instructions.
My question is, what can be changing the kernel between being on static
storage and being loaded? Or am I just being fooled into thinking something
changed it? I'm thinking that it had something to do with mutex locking
and SMP, but I looked through boot code and tried googling and came up with
nothing. Another possibility is me interpreting non-instructions as
instructions.
Example:
The following pattern repeats a lot:
1325c1326,1327
< 1089: f0 0f b3 04 24 lock btr %eax,(%esp)
---
> 1089: 90 nop
> 108a: 0f b3 04 24 btr %eax,(%esp)
As well as other changes:
94383,94384c94832,94835
< 47bb3: f0 83 04 24 00 lock addl $0x0,(%esp)
< 47bb8: f0 ff 05 7c 30 80 c0 lock incl 0xc080307c
---
> 47bb3: 0f ae f0 mfence
> 47bb6: 89 f6 mov %esi,%esi
> 47bb8: 90 nop
> 47bb9: ff 05 7c 30 80 c0 incl 0xc080307c
(I'm not subscribed; please cc any responses to me)
Thanks in advance,
Yan
next reply other threads:[~2008-03-14 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-14 14:51 Yan [this message]
2008-03-14 16:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-14 16:08 ` Yan
2008-03-14 16:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54b90fdf0803140751m71935a09r9b039ca6eb124f4d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rottled@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®