From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF16C433E7 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5437C208FE for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729474AbgJLJ4j (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 05:56:39 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:34280 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726104AbgJLJ4i (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 05:56:38 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5251C31B; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 02:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.2] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 527D63F719; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 02:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 15/17] sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs rt/dl balancing To: Peter Zijlstra , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, qais.yousef@arm.com, swood@redhat.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vincent.donnefort@arm.com, tj@kernel.org References: <20201005145717.346020688@infradead.org> <20201005150922.458081448@infradead.org> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: <54bebe28-1d6d-5f71-da57-deb2eee111d3@arm.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:56:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201005150922.458081448@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/10/2020 16:57, Peter Zijlstra wrote: [...] > --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c > @@ -1859,7 +1859,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_pus > * running task can migrate over to a CPU that is running a task > * of lesser priority. > */ > -static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq) > +static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq, bool pull) > { > struct task_struct *next_task; > struct rq *lowest_rq; > @@ -1873,6 +1873,34 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq) > return 0; > > retry: > + if (is_migration_disabled(next_task)) { > + struct task_struct *push_task = NULL; > + int cpu; > + > + if (!pull || rq->push_busy) > + return 0; Shouldn't there be the same functionality in push_dl_task(), i.e. returning 0 earlier for a task with migration_disabled? [...]