mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Introduce power off call chain API
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:11:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54c7b83e-22ae-2521-1f44-ec9b2e21464e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YV65qsQPtQfWvE9W@smile.fi.intel.com>

07.10.2021 12:11, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 11:52:46AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 07.10.2021 10:18, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
>>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:05 AM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>> This
>>>> is a somewhat simplified version which doesn't try to convert whole kernel
>>>> to the new API at once, but solves immediate practical problem that we
>>>
>>> problems
>>>
>>>> have on Nexus 7 Android tablet where device needs to chain power off
>>>
>>> tablets where the device
>>
>> Thank you for the corrections, so far there is one problem and one tablet :)
> 
> Then use "the Nexus 7 Android tablet" :-)
> 
>>> Immediate question here is how do you see the plan of spreading this.
>>> I.o.w. can you put an explanation that you have checked, let's say
>>>> 80% current users, and they may be converted like [example
>>> placeholder] without any special tricks?
>>
>> The rough plan is:
>>
>> 1. Add new API.
>> 2. Convert drivers to the new API per subsystem.
> 
> I would suggest to show that you are actually into it by converting a couple of
> the subsystems for the starter.

Noted

>> 3. Expose do_kernel_restart().
>> 4. Replace pm_power_off() with do_kernel_poweroff() per arch/, making
>> power off similar to the restart that uses do_kernel_restart().
>> 5. Remove do_kernel_restart() from kernel/reboot.c
>>
>> Majority of pm_power_off() users shouldn't need the chaining and
>> pm_power_off() doesn't conflict with the new API, so there is no need to
>> rush the conversion.
>>
>> The single-link chain users could be converted to the new API directly,
>> this will remove some global variables. But at first should be better to
>> gain more users who actually need the chained power off since they may
>> have very specific requirements not covered by the current variant of
>> the API and will be easier to evolve API with less users.
> 
> All above in one or another form should be in cover letter.

Alright, apparently I overestimated a tad awareness about the current
status. I'll extend the cover letter next time, thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2021-10-07 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-07  6:02 Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-07  6:02 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] notifier: Add blocking_notifier_call_chain_empty() Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-07  6:02 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] kernel: Add power off handler call chain API Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-07  6:02 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] kernel: Add devm_register_restart_handler() Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-07  6:02 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] mfd: max77620: Use power off call chain API Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-19 15:31   ` Lee Jones
2021-10-19 20:51     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-07  6:02 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] soc/tegra: pmc: Use devm_register_restart_handler() Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-07  6:02 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] soc/tegra: pmc: Add power off handler Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-07  7:18 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] Introduce power off call chain API Andy Shevchenko
2021-10-07  8:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-07  9:11     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-10-07 10:11       ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54c7b83e-22ae-2521-1f44-ec9b2e21464e@gmail.com \
    --to=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®