Re: [PATCH v2] media: b2c2: flexcop-eeprom: Fix assignment and missing return in MAC check

[Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>]

> Fixes a coding style violation and build error in
> `flexcop_eeprom_check_mac_addr()`.

Will it be more desirable to separate some adjustments?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.16-rc6#n81



>                                    The function contained
> an invalid assignment in an if-condition and was missing
> a return at the end of a non-void function.

I find this information inappropriate.


…
> ---
>  drivers/media/common/b2c2/flexcop-eeprom.c | 15 +++++++++------
…

How do you think about to improve your version management?
https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=%22This+looks+like+a+new+version+of+a+previously+submitted+patch%22
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.16-rc6#n784


…
> @@ -135,12 +135,15 @@ int flexcop_eeprom_check_mac_addr(struct flexcop_device *fc, int extended)
>  	u8 buf[8];
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if ((ret = flexcop_eeprom_lrc_read(fc,0x3f8,buf,8,4)) == 0) {
> +	ret = flexcop_eeprom_lrc_read(fc, 0x3f8, buf, 8, 4);
> +
> +	if (ret == 0) {

Would you like to use the following code variant?

	int ret = flexcop_eeprom_lrc_read(fc, 0x3f8, buf, 8, 4);


…
> +			ret = ret = -EINVAL;
…

Why do you present a duplicate assignment for this variable?

Regards,
Markus