From: CJ <firefly0158@163.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.com
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: INFO: task hung in do_get_write_access on v7.3-rc2
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 17:02:24 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5513ea81.79f0.1a1c9d81560.Coremail.firefly0158@163.com> (raw)
Hi,
syzbot reported "INFO: task hung in do_get_write_access" on Linux 6.1. The same failure is still
reproducible on v7.3-rc2 with the adapted reproducer described below.
The reproducer writes the PCI command register of the block controller that backs the root ext4 filesystem, disabling normal I/O, and then keeps buffered writes and delalloc activity running. The adapted C program discovers the backing PCI function dynamically instead of relying on a fixed guest BDF. It also lowers hung_task_timeout_secs to 20 so the stall is captured inside the replay window; no fault injection is used.
The target console reports tasks blocked in I/O wait in do_get_write_access, reached through jbd2_journal_get_write_access and the ext4 inode-dirty path.
An in-flight journal transaction waits for metadata I/O that no longer completes. The report establishes the blocked path, not the final device-state root cause.
The candidate changes /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs to 20. This is a detection-window setting, not fault injection, but it is an environment change. Attempts 1 and 2 were machine failure/timeout; attempt 3 produced the evidence.
This is a follow-up for the existing syzbot report https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9e3d85789d3996cc829c, not a
bisected root cause. The target report shares
18 key frames with the source crash report.
Reproducer:
C reproducer: https://pastebin.com/raw/ABvzeXMS
console output: https://pastebin.com/raw/HUs8ymdz
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=KernelConfig&x=31dfefc4a14efea3
Kernel:
HEAD commit: df2908090cda368b01ff43709f51890076c56157
git tree: linux-stable
kernel version: 7.3.0-rc2
tested tag: v7.3-rc2
Let me know if you need more details or testing.
Thanks.
reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5513ea81.79f0.1a1c9d81560.Coremail.firefly0158@163.com \
--to=firefly0158@163.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®