From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, "Greg Ungerer" <gerg@snapgear.com>,
"David McCullough" <David_Mccullough@securecomputing.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bryan Wu" <Bryan.Wu@analog.com>,
"Bernd Schmidt" <bernds_cb1@t-online.de>,
"Robin Getz" <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
Subject: Re: nommu: handling anonymous mmap clearing in userspace rather than kernel
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:20:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5516.1207146014@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0804011434r4869fbe8t89ade12c04c97f2@mail.gmail.com>
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> a workaround: introduce a new no-mmu-only mmap flag MAP_UNINITIALIZE
> to signal to the kernel that it should skip the memset(). this way,
> userspace malloc() can do mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_UNINITIALIZE) to get
> large chunks of memory without affecting any other anonymous mmap()
> call.
I think that's reasonable for NOMMU. It's not like the process accessing the
uninitialised memory is prevented from accessing anything it wants to anyway.
I would vote that the memset() should only be skipped if requested as there
may be programs that call mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS) expecting the memory they're
given to be zeroed out.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-02 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 21:34 Mike Frysinger
2008-04-02 14:20 ` David Howells [this message]
2008-04-02 14:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-04-02 15:03 ` Bernd Schmidt
2008-04-02 15:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-04-03 11:06 ` Bernd Schmidt
2008-04-03 14:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-04-03 13:14 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5516.1207146014@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=Bryan.Wu@analog.com \
--cc=David_Mccullough@securecomputing.com \
--cc=bernds_cb1@t-online.de \
--cc=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome