From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] nohz: add tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus() API
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:41:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55197CA2.9040706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <551977C1.4000303@ezchip.com>
On 03/30/2015 12:20 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> I wanted to ping the patch below again, since I haven't heard any
> feedback.
>
> I note that Rik van Riel's change posted this weekend offers similar
> functionality for userspace. My change offers a convenient API
> for, e.g., kernel drivers setting up default irq balancing.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/28/94
I submitted a patch to irqbalance to exclude nohz_full
cpus from having irqs assigned to them. I could see
the same thing being useful for in-kernel irq assignment,
especially for multi-queue devices that set up irqs on
multiple CPUs.
> An alternate API would be one that just returned the full no_hz
> cpumask to kernel callers; I'd be happy with that as well, but my
> instinct was to make the API as narrow as possible to start with.
>
> Comments?
What drivers and subsystems are you targeting?
I am just looking at blk-mq now, and it seems like the
API most appropriate for that would be an inline function
that tests whether or not a CPU is nohz_full.
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
...
if (cpu_nohz_full(i))
continue;
}
A lot of the other code in drivers and subsystems that
set up per-cpu queues and irqs seem to iterate over all
CPUs at init time, and could benefit from a function
allowing them to skip nohz_full CPUs.
Your tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus() function seems reasonable
too, for code that uses a cpumask to set up per cpu stuff.
> On 03/24/2015 03:21 PM, cmetcalf@ezchip.com wrote:
>> From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
>>
>> This is useful, for example, to modify a cpumask to avoid the
>> nohz cores so that interrupts aren't sent to them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
>> ---
>> Motivated by patch 4/4 in this series.
>>
>> include/linux/tick.h | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
>> index 9c085dc12ae9..d53ad4892a39 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
>> @@ -186,6 +186,12 @@ static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu)
>> return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask);
>> }
>> +static inline void tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus(struct cpumask *mask)
>> +{
>> + if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
>> + cpumask_andnot(mask, mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
>> +}
>> +
>> extern void __tick_nohz_full_check(void);
>> extern void tick_nohz_full_kick(void);
>> extern void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu);
>> @@ -194,6 +200,7 @@ extern void __tick_nohz_task_switch(struct
>> task_struct *tsk);
>> #else
>> static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void) { return false; }
>> static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu) { return false; }
>> +static inline void tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus(struct cpumask *mask) { }
>> static inline void __tick_nohz_full_check(void) { }
>> static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu) { }
>> static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick(void) { }
>
--
All rights reversed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-30 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-24 19:21 [PATCH 0/4] initial NOHZ_FULL support for tile cmetcalf
2015-03-24 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] tile: support arch_irq_work_raise cmetcalf
2015-03-24 21:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-03-24 21:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-24 22:06 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-25 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-24 19:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] tile: support CONTEXT_TRACKING and thus NOHZ_FULL cmetcalf
2015-03-24 21:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-03-24 21:49 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-24 19:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] nohz: add tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus() API cmetcalf
2015-03-30 16:20 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-30 16:41 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-03-30 16:45 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-24 19:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] net: tile: don't send interrupts to nohz cores by default cmetcalf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55197CA2.9040706@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome