From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752506AbbDAGNp (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 02:13:45 -0400 Received: from svenfoo.org ([82.94.215.22]:33066 "EHLO mail.zonque.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750908AbbDAGNn (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 02:13:43 -0400 Message-ID: <551B8C93.8010204@zonque.org> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:13:39 +0200 From: Daniel Mack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guenter Roeck , Stephen Rothwell , Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren , Felipe Balbi , Ard Biesheuvel , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Lad@roeck-us.net, Prabhakar , Thomas Gleixner , Mikko Perttunen , Thierry Reding Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits) References: <20150401000221.21961ecd@canb.auug.org.au> <20150331161640.GA16540@roeck-us.net> <20150331230749.GA6564@kroah.com> <20150401104233.563d0022@canb.auug.org.au> <551B56E0.7090209@roeck-us.net> <551B5BDC.5060706@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <551B5BDC.5060706@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/01/2015 04:45 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 03/31/2015 07:24 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> Now I am left with the question if the samples build should be >> masked for alpha and mips, or if I should drop building samples >> from my 'allmodconfig' builds. I think I'll do the latter; >> there seems to be an expectation that samples are built with >> a recent toolchain, and I can not keep rebuilding toolchains for >> the rest of my life. >> > > Weird - the kdbus sample doesn't have its own configuration option, > unlike other samples. So it's all or nothing for alpha and mips. I've already sent a patch for this yesterday, and I'm sure Greg will merge it anytime soon: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/31/306 I wouldn't mind if we masked that config symbol for archs which don't have memfds wired, but I'm also open to other suggestions. Thanks, Daniel