Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen/virtio: Avoid use of the dom0 backend in dom0

[Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>]

On 6/21/23 19:58, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> On 21.06.23 16:12, Petr Pavlu wrote:
>> When attempting to run Xen on a QEMU/KVM virtual machine with virtio
>> devices (all x86_64), dom0 tries to establish a grant for itself which
>> eventually results in a hang during the boot.
>>
>> The backtrace looks as follows, the while loop in __send_control_msg()
>> makes no progress:
>>
>>    #0  virtqueue_get_buf_ctx (_vq=_vq@entry=0xffff8880074a8400, len=len@entry=0xffffc90000413c94, ctx=ctx@entry=0x0 <fixed_percpu_data>) at ../drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:2326
>>    #1  0xffffffff817086b7 in virtqueue_get_buf (_vq=_vq@entry=0xffff8880074a8400, len=len@entry=0xffffc90000413c94) at ../drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:2333
>>    #2  0xffffffff8175f6b2 in __send_control_msg (portdev=<optimized out>, port_id=0xffffffff, event=0x0, value=0x1) at ../drivers/char/virtio_console.c:562
>>    #3  0xffffffff8175f6ee in __send_control_msg (portdev=<optimized out>, port_id=<optimized out>, event=<optimized out>, value=<optimized out>) at ../drivers/char/virtio_console.c:569
>>    #4  0xffffffff817618b1 in virtcons_probe (vdev=0xffff88800585e800) at ../drivers/char/virtio_console.c:2098
>>    #5  0xffffffff81707117 in virtio_dev_probe (_d=0xffff88800585e810) at ../drivers/virtio/virtio.c:305
>>    #6  0xffffffff8198e348 in call_driver_probe (drv=0xffffffff82be40c0 <virtio_console>, drv=0xffffffff82be40c0 <virtio_console>, dev=0xffff88800585e810) at ../drivers/base/dd.c:579
>>    #7  really_probe (dev=dev@entry=0xffff88800585e810, drv=drv@entry=0xffffffff82be40c0 <virtio_console>) at ../drivers/base/dd.c:658
>>    #8  0xffffffff8198e58f in __driver_probe_device (drv=drv@entry=0xffffffff82be40c0 <virtio_console>, dev=dev@entry=0xffff88800585e810) at ../drivers/base/dd.c:800
>>    #9  0xffffffff8198e65a in driver_probe_device (drv=drv@entry=0xffffffff82be40c0 <virtio_console>, dev=dev@entry=0xffff88800585e810) at ../drivers/base/dd.c:830
>>    #10 0xffffffff8198e832 in __driver_attach (dev=0xffff88800585e810, data=0xffffffff82be40c0 <virtio_console>) at ../drivers/base/dd.c:1216
>>    #11 0xffffffff8198bfb2 in bus_for_each_dev (bus=<optimized out>, start=start@entry=0x0 <fixed_percpu_data>, data=data@entry=0xffffffff82be40c0 <virtio_console>,
>>        fn=fn@entry=0xffffffff8198e7b0 <__driver_attach>) at ../drivers/base/bus.c:368
>>    #12 0xffffffff8198db65 in driver_attach (drv=drv@entry=0xffffffff82be40c0 <virtio_console>) at ../drivers/base/dd.c:1233
>>    #13 0xffffffff8198d207 in bus_add_driver (drv=drv@entry=0xffffffff82be40c0 <virtio_console>) at ../drivers/base/bus.c:673
>>    #14 0xffffffff8198f550 in driver_register (drv=drv@entry=0xffffffff82be40c0 <virtio_console>) at ../drivers/base/driver.c:246
>>    #15 0xffffffff81706b47 in register_virtio_driver (driver=driver@entry=0xffffffff82be40c0 <virtio_console>) at ../drivers/virtio/virtio.c:357
>>    #16 0xffffffff832cd34b in virtio_console_init () at ../drivers/char/virtio_console.c:2258
>>    #17 0xffffffff8100105c in do_one_initcall (fn=0xffffffff832cd2e0 <virtio_console_init>) at ../init/main.c:1246
>>    #18 0xffffffff83277293 in do_initcall_level (command_line=0xffff888003e2f900 "root", level=0x6) at ../init/main.c:1319
>>    #19 do_initcalls () at ../init/main.c:1335
>>    #20 do_basic_setup () at ../init/main.c:1354
>>    #21 kernel_init_freeable () at ../init/main.c:1571
>>    #22 0xffffffff81f64be1 in kernel_init (unused=<optimized out>) at ../init/main.c:1462
>>    #23 0xffffffff81001f49 in ret_from_fork () at ../arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
>>    #24 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>>
>> Fix the problem by preventing xen_grant_init_backend_domid() from
>> setting dom0 as a backend when running in dom0.
>>
>> Fixes: 035e3a4321f7 ("xen/virtio: Optimize the setup of "xen-grant-dma" devices")
> 
> 
> I am not 100% sure whether the Fixes tag points to precise commit. If I 
> am not mistaken, the said commit just moves the code in the context 
> without changing the logic of CONFIG_XEN_VIRTIO_FORCE_GRANT, this was 
> introduced before.

I see, the tag should better point to 7228113d1fa0 ("xen/virtio: use
dom0 as default backend for CONFIG_XEN_VIRTIO_FORCE_GRANT") which
introduced the original logic to use dom0 as backend.

Commit 035e3a4321f7 ("xen/virtio: Optimize the setup of "xen-grant-dma"
devices") is relevant in sense that it extended when this logic is
active by adding an OR check for xen_pv_domain().

> 
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/xen/grant-dma-ops.c | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/grant-dma-ops.c b/drivers/xen/grant-dma-ops.c
>> index 76f6f26265a3..29ed27ac450e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/xen/grant-dma-ops.c
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/grant-dma-ops.c
>> @@ -362,7 +362,9 @@ static int xen_grant_init_backend_domid(struct device *dev,
>>   	if (np) {
>>   		ret = xen_dt_grant_init_backend_domid(dev, np, backend_domid);
>>   		of_node_put(np);
>> -	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_VIRTIO_FORCE_GRANT) || xen_pv_domain()) {
>> +	} else if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XEN_VIRTIO_FORCE_GRANT) ||
>> +		    xen_pv_domain()) &&
>> +		   !xen_initial_domain()) {
> 
> The commit lgtm, just one note:
> 
> 
> I would even bail out early in xen_virtio_restricted_mem_acc() instead,
> as I assume the same issue could happen on Arm with DT (although there 
> we don't guess the backend's domid, we read it from DT and quite 
> unlikely we get Dom0 being in Dom0 with correct DT).
> 
> Something like:
> 
> @@ -416,6 +421,10 @@ bool xen_virtio_restricted_mem_acc(struct 
> virtio_device *dev)
>   {
>          domid_t backend_domid;
> 
> +       /* Xen grant DMA ops are not used when running as initial domain */
> +       if (xen_initial_domain())
> +               return false;
> +
>          if (!xen_grant_init_backend_domid(dev->dev.parent, 
> &backend_domid)) {
>                  xen_grant_setup_dma_ops(dev->dev.parent, backend_domid);
>                  return true;
> (END)
> 
> 
> 
> If so, that commit subject would need to be updated accordingly.
> 
> Let's see what other reviewers will say.

Ok, makes sense.

Thanks,
Petr