From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (mailout.nod.at [116.203.167.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C206829A9CD for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 20:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.167.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762545806; cv=none; b=SG9b4R3o/5SJrQFtPE/nxdeuQxpY+WEm9QnIy20UjerDnpObglBwJXP1MjKf/fVf2Yxkf3VnlrWplYtdNFNor2zV0v26gaDHMmyanvF9SQ0VHcAwELV1Y23CBq4O5w0R4nPw54qYWTiCuXVI6ODEzBm7fWh5GjnuLziZO5QAP2U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762545806; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q057139mbSLFqM2gjZ2QezG+lPcNonFvnYn2UZm/59Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=soP3jfQSKPGKFiuGpAuKydFiUb8ipMj7FVQYAITX1XL8dmuO46vLnygl3fAB8rl8rQb0gYTJqjkFmigfRkIPgR3IxEUoalfxjk6Msbe8RSun42HSLKtI7+IYJw7rRbz27dESTfGj/038GmaBJe7+LsMxwMor9lfQeV/cugGhmLY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nod.at; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.167.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nod.at Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D3F2B03EC; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 21:03:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id X-nbup-2UNCI; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 21:03:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553D011C057; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 21:03:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 51_Gcrbkj5Yv; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 21:03:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (lithops.sigma-star.at [195.201.40.130]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA3911C056; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 21:03:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 21:03:19 +0100 (CET) From: Richard Weinberger To: Eddie James Cc: linux-mtd , chengzhihao1 , OpenBMC Maillist , linux-kernel , sethjenkins@google.com, adobriyan Message-ID: <55378147.159026.1762545799936.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> In-Reply-To: <068ba254-0053-46d5-bff4-74c948d2e8ac@linux.ibm.com> References: <068ba254-0053-46d5-bff4-74c948d2e8ac@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: UBIFS errors since Linux 5.15 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3807 (ZimbraWebClient - FF143 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3809) Thread-Topic: UBIFS errors since Linux 5.15 Thread-Index: +EEJ8XwfiheRTquyWgicZAVkYE0nQQ== Eddie, ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Eddie James" > An: "linux-mtd" , "richard" , "chengzhihao1" , > "OpenBMC Maillist" , "linux-kernel" , sethjenkins@google.com, > "adobriyan" > Gesendet: Freitag, 7. November 2025 18:38:54 > Betreff: UBIFS errors since Linux 5.15 > Hello, >=20 > We are updating some BMC (Aspeed AST2600, ARM32) systems that were on > Linux 5.4 but observe consistent UBIFS errors with Linux 5.15 and later. > The errors seem to vary; there is a sampling below. >=20 >=20 > We performed a git bisect and came up with the following commit, which > of course is completely unrelated to UBIFS. Reverting it does prevent > the issue... Does anyone have any suggestions? >=20 > commit 33fc9e26b7cb39f0d4219c875a2451802249c225 > Author: Seth Jenkins > Date:=C2=A0 =C2=A0Thu Oct 27 11:36:52 2022 -0400 That's indeed strange. Are you absolutely sure that this commit triggers the issue? E.g. if you revert it on top of 5.15 the issue vanishes and when you re-apply it, the issue is back? Thanks, //richard