mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <annie.li@oracle.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/events: Clear cpu_evtchn_mask before resuming
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:32:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <554107A6.50604@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <553FD1A5.60409@oracle.com>

On 28/04/15 19:29, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 04/28/2015 12:28 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 28/04/15 16:52, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> When a guest is resumed, the hypervisor may change event channel
>>> assignments. If this happens and the guest uses 2-level events it
>>> is possible for the interrupt to be claimed by wrong VCPU since
>>> cpu_evtchn_mask bits may be stale. This can happen even though
>>> evtchn_2l_bind_to_cpu() attempts to clear old bits: irq_info that
>>> is passed in is not necessarily the original one (from pre-migration
>>> times) but instead is freshly allocated during resume and so any
>>> information about which CPU the channel was bound to is lost.
>>>
>>> Thus we should clear the mask during resume.
>>>
>>> We also need to make sure that bits for xenstore and console channels
>>> are set when these two subsystems are resumed. While rebind_evtchn_irq()
>>> (which is invoked for both of them on a resume) calls
>>> irq_set_affinity(),
>>> the latter will in fact postpone setting affinity until handling the
>>> interrupt. But because cpu_evtchn_mask will have bits for these two
>>> cleared
>>> we won't be able to take the interrupt.
>>>
>>> Setting IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT flag for the two irqs avoids this problem by
>>> allowing to set affinity immediately, which is safe for
>>> event-channel-based
>>> interrupts.
>> [...]
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
>>> @@ -533,6 +533,7 @@ static int __init xen_hvc_init(void)
>>>             info = vtermno_to_xencons(HVC_COOKIE);
>>>           info->irq = bind_evtchn_to_irq(info->evtchn);
>>> +        irq_set_status_flags(info->irq, IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT);
>>>       }
>>>       if (info->irq < 0)
>>>           info->irq = 0; /* NO_IRQ */
>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_2l.c
>>> b/drivers/xen/events/events_2l.c
>>> index 5db43fc..7dd4631 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_2l.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_2l.c
>>> @@ -345,6 +345,15 @@ irqreturn_t xen_debug_interrupt(int irq, void
>>> *dev_id)
>>>       return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>>   }
>>>   +static void evtchn_2l_resume(void)
>>> +{
>>> +    int i;
>>> +
>>> +    for_each_online_cpu(i)
>>> +        memset(per_cpu(cpu_evtchn_mask, i), 0, sizeof(xen_ulong_t) *
>>> +                EVTCHN_2L_NR_CHANNELS/BITS_PER_EVTCHN_WORD);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static const struct evtchn_ops evtchn_ops_2l = {
>>>       .max_channels      = evtchn_2l_max_channels,
>>>       .nr_channels       = evtchn_2l_max_channels,
>>> @@ -356,6 +365,7 @@ static const struct evtchn_ops evtchn_ops_2l = {
>>>       .mask              = evtchn_2l_mask,
>>>       .unmask            = evtchn_2l_unmask,
>>>       .handle_events     = evtchn_2l_handle_events,
>>> +    .resume               = evtchn_2l_resume,
>>>   };
>>>     void __init xen_evtchn_2l_init(void)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c
>>> b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c
>>> index fdb0f33..30203d1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c
>>> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ int xb_init_comms(void)
>>>           }
>>>             xenbus_irq = err;
>>> +        irq_set_status_flags(xenbus_irq, IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT);
>> IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT means "Interrupt can be migrated from process context"
>> which doesn't really sound relevant to me here?
>>
>> Thomas Glexnier is really not happy with mis-use of IRQ APIs.
> 
> Yes, this is somewhat expanding definition of IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT but then
> there are other devices that do the same (HPET, for one).

Ok.  But why set it on only these two event channels and not every one?

>>  From the commit log the evtchn_2l_resume() fucntion that's added sounds
>> like it fixes the problem on its own?
> 
> It in fact makes this problem worse since now that cpu_evtchn_mask is
> cleared during resume we cannot process the interrupt anymore in
> evtchn_2l_handle_events(): irqs have to be bound to a cpu in order for
> an interrupt to be processed.

Perhaps evtchn_2l_resume() should set the local cpu mask for any bound
event channels? And then you wouldn't need IRQ_MOVE_PCNTX.

> We already have this issue even without clearing the mask if, say,
> xenstore channel changes or if it gets bound to cpu other than 0 before
> suspend. It's just that we rarely (if ever) see this happen.
> 
> We can explicitly call events_base.c:set_affinity_irq() from
> rebind_evtchn_irq() after irq_set_affinity() if we want to avoid using
> IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT flag but that will also looks kind of strange.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-29 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-28 15:52 [PATCH 0/4] A few event channel-related fixes Boris Ostrovsky
2015-04-28 15:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] xen/events: Clear cpu_evtchn_mask before resuming Boris Ostrovsky
2015-04-28 16:28   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2015-04-28 18:29     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-04-29 16:32       ` David Vrabel [this message]
2015-04-29 16:54         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-04-29 17:59           ` David Vrabel
2015-04-29 18:26             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-04-28 15:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] xen/xenbus: Update xenbus event channel on resume Boris Ostrovsky
2015-04-28 16:32   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2015-04-28 15:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] xen/console: Update console " Boris Ostrovsky
2015-04-28 16:33   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2015-04-28 15:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] xen/events: Set irq_info->evtchn before binding the channel to CPU in __startup_pirq() Boris Ostrovsky
2015-04-28 16:34   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=554107A6.50604@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=annie.li@oracle.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome