mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Relax a restriction in sched_rt_can_attach()
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 12:39:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5546F80B.3070802@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430709236.3129.42.camel@gmail.com>

On 2015/5/4 11:13, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 08:54 +0800, Zefan Li wrote:
>> It's allowed to promote a task from normal to realtime after it has been
>> attached to a non-root cgroup, but it will fail if the attaching happens
>> after it has become realtime. I don't see how this restriction is useful.
> 
> In the CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED case, promotion will fail is there is no
> bandwidth allocated.
> 

Right. I forgot to mention this patch affects !CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED only,
though it should be obvious by reading the change.

>> We are moving toward unified hierarchy where all the cgroup controllers
>> are bound together, so it would make cgroups easier to use if we have less
>> restrictions on attaching tasks between cgroups.
> 
> Forcing group scheduling overhead on users if they want cpuset or memory
> cgroup functionality would be far from wonderful.  Am I interpreting the
> implications of this unification/binding properly?
> 
> (I hope not, surely the plan is not to utterly _destroy_ cgroup utility)
> 

Some degree of flexibility is provided so that you may disable some controllers
in a subtree. For example:

root                  ---> child1
(cpuset,memory,cpu)        (cpuset,memory)
                      \
                       \-> child2
                           (cpu)


  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-04  4:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04  0:54 Zefan Li
2015-05-04  3:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-04  4:39   ` Zefan Li [this message]
2015-05-04  5:10     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-04  5:39       ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-04  9:11         ` Zefan Li
2015-05-04 12:08           ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-04 12:37           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-04 14:09             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-05  3:46               ` Zefan Li
2015-05-05  6:02                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-05  3:54             ` Zefan Li
2015-05-05 14:10               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-05 14:18                 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-05 15:19                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-05 16:31                     ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-05 19:00                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-05 19:06                         ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-06  8:49                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-05 14:41             ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-05 15:11               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-05 16:13                 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-05 16:50                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-05 18:29                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-05 19:00                       ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-06  9:12                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-05 18:31                     ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-05 14:09         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5546F80B.3070802@huawei.com \
    --to=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome