mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
To: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org
Cc: wangnan0@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pi3orama@163.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] perf bpf: Probing with local variable
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 15:31:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <554944C1.3060705@plumgrid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430820612-84443-1-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.com>

On 5/5/15 3:10 AM, He Kuang wrote:
> This patch set is based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/30/264
>
> By using bpf 'config' section like this:
>
>    char _config2[] SEC("config") = "generic_perform_write=generic_perform_write+122 file->f_mapping->a_ops bytes offset";
>    SEC("generic_perform_write")
>    int NODE_generic_perform_write (struct pt_regs *ctx, void *a_ops, void *bytes, void* offset) {
>            char fmt[] = "NODE_generic_perform_write, a_ops=%p, bytes=%p, offset=%p\n";
>            bpf_trace_printk(fmt, sizeof(fmt), a_ops, bytes, offset);
>            return 1;
>    }
>
> In this example, 'bytes' and 'offset' are local variables, a_ops is in
> the structure field of file parameter, and we probe in the body of the
> generic_perform_write() function.
>
> Perf can fetch and convert all the arguments and then we translate them
> into bpf bytecode as a prologue before calling bpf body functions. In
> the prologue, we fetch arguments from bpf context register and place
> them according to bpf calling conventions so the body function can
> access them as formal parameters.

great idea! Like it a lot.
Looking at current implementation I think the limit is <=3 arguments,
which I think is perfectly fine for now. Just worth mentioning in
the doc.

Two high level comments:
- can you collapse SEC("config") with SEC("func_name") ?
It seems that "func_name" is only used as reference inside "config".
I understand that you're proposing one "config" section where multiple
descriptions are strcat together, but why? Something like:
SEC("kprobe/generic_perform_write+122(file->f_mapping->a_ops, bytes, 
offset)")
int func(...) { ... }
should be enough and more concise.

- please support it without debug info when kprobe is placed at the top
of the function. Like:
SEC("kprobe/generic_perform_write(void*, void*, long long)")
even without debug info it will copy ctx->di into r2, ctx->si into r3
and ctx->dx into r4.
Not everyone has access to debug info when writing programs.
Your prologue generator removes headache of figuring out cpu calling
convention and can even work for 32-bit architectures.
Also I think it belongs in tools/lib/bpf/ together with section walking
and loading bits. As we discussed in the other thread it makes to create
a proper library out of samples/bpf/libbpf*, bpf_load* and use it
everywhere. Once it's there I'd like to rewrite samples/bpf/*_kern.c
using this simplified access to function arguments.

Other comments per patch...



  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-05 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-05 10:10 He Kuang
2015-05-05 10:10 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] perf bpf: Add headers for generate bpf bytecode He Kuang
2015-05-05 22:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-05-05 10:10 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] perf bpf: Add pt_regs convert table for x86 He Kuang
2015-05-05 22:44   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-05-08  8:02   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-05 10:10 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] perf bpf: Save pt_regs info from debuginfo He Kuang
2015-05-05 10:10 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] perf bpf: Convert arglist to bpf prologue He Kuang
2015-05-05 22:54   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-05-05 10:10 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] perf bpf: Process debuginfo for generating " He Kuang
2015-05-05 10:10 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] perf bpf: Generate bpf prologue for arguments He Kuang
2015-05-05 22:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2015-05-06  3:58   ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] perf bpf: Probing with local variable Wang Nan
2015-05-06  4:10     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-05-06  4:41       ` Wang Nan
2015-05-06  1:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-06  1:44   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=554944C1.3060705@plumgrid.com \
    --to=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pi3orama@163.com \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome