From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752705AbdKHPmt (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 10:42:49 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:34630 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752562AbdKHPmr (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 10:42:47 -0500 Cc: Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ALKML , LKML , DTML , Roy Franz , Harb Abdulhamid , Nishanth Menon , Loc Ho , Ryan Harkin , Jassi Brar , Viresh Kumar , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 20/20] cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency switching To: Arnd Bergmann References: <1509720477-18936-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1509720477-18936-21-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <4588325.776kYim3Ci@aspire.rjw.lan> <3f79f75f-1b6a-3f7b-b0c0-f970f0fb6c12@arm.com> From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <555fa0d1-6499-3d40-29c3-0c3148a6bff0@arm.com> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:42:39 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/11/17 11:05, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> >> >> On 08/11/17 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Friday, November 3, 2017 3:47:57 PM CET Sudeep Holla wrote: >>>> The cpufreq core provides option for drivers to implement fast_switch >>>> callback which is invoked for frequency switching from interrupt context. >>>> >>>> This patch adds support for fast_switch callback in SCMI cpufreq driver >>>> by making use of polling based SCMI transfer. It also sets the flag >>>> fast_switch_possible. >>>> >>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >>>> Cc: Viresh Kumar >>>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org >>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla >>> >>> I'm assuming that this material will go in along with the rest of the series >>> through a different tree. >>> >> >> Indeed, I will ask ARM-SoC guys to take it via their tree when ready. I >> assume you are fine with that, please provide ack if that's still the case. > > Yes, that makes sense. > Thanks Arnd. Thanks Rafael for the ack. -- Regards, Sudeep