On 05/25/2015 08:32 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> Em Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:12:44PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
>>> On 05/25/2015 01:09 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>>
>>>> * Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Right optimize debugging experience is given by passing -Og to
>>>>>>> compiler. Assign default value for pointers that are identified by
>>>>>>> compiler as non-initialized.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> s/Right optimize debugging experience is given/
>>>>>>    Correct debugging experience is given/
>>>>
>>>>> Right debugging experience is given by passing -Og to compiler.
>>>>
>>>> So I fixed the spelling here once already :-/ If you want to use
>>>> 'right' in this context then use it like this:
>>>>
>>>>    The right debugging experience is given by ...
>>>>
>>>> Or you can use what I suggested first:
>>>>
>>>>    Correct debugging experience is given by ...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> 	Ingo
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry Ingo for that, I overlooked that correction :)
>>
>> Are you ok with this Ingo?
>
> Yeah, certainly!
>
>> I can apply, but there seems to be two patches folded here, one that
>> sets the possibly unitiliazed variables to NULL, and could be the
>> first in the series, and the other, that deals with multiple
>> versions of gcc and how should we ask something from them.
>
> Yeah.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	Ingo
>

Hello.

As Arnaldo pointed, I split the patch to following 2 smaller patches.

Thanks,
Martin