From: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
"jianyong.wu@arm.com" <jianyong.wu@arm.com>,
"justin.he@arm.com" <justin.he@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Rename acpi_scan_device_not_present() to be about enumeration
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:15:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5589E5A5-9F97-416A-9C48-9828B0BE58CD@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1qtuWW-00AQ7P-0W@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Hi Russell,
> On 20 Oct 2023, at 18:47, Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>
> acpi_scan_device_not_present() is called when a device in the
> hierarchy is not available for enumeration. Historically enumeration
> was only based on whether the device was present.
>
> To add support for only enumerating devices that are both present
> and enabled, this helper should be renamed. It was only ever about
> enumeration, rename it acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated().
>
> No change in behaviour is intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Fixes: 443fc8202272 ("ACPI / hotplug: Rework generic code to handle suprise removals”) ?
> ---
> This is another patch from James' aarch64 hotplug vcpu series.
>
> I asked:
>> Is this another patch which ought to be submitted without waiting
>> for the rest of the series?
> to which Jonathan Cameron replied:
>> Looks like a valid standalone change to me.
>
> So let's get this queued up.
>
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index ed01e19514ef..17ab875a7d4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -289,10 +289,10 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int acpi_scan_device_not_present(struct acpi_device *adev)
> +static int acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(struct acpi_device *adev)
> {
> if (!acpi_device_enumerated(adev)) {
> - dev_warn(&adev->dev, "Still not present\n");
> + dev_warn(&adev->dev, "Still not enumerated\n");
> return -EALREADY;
> }
> acpi_bus_trim(adev);
> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_device_check(struct acpi_device *adev)
> error = -ENODEV;
> }
> } else {
> - error = acpi_scan_device_not_present(adev);
> + error = acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(adev);
> }
> return error;
> }
> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_bus_check(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
>
> acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
> if (!acpi_device_is_present(adev)) {
> - acpi_scan_device_not_present(adev);
> + acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(adev);
Feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
Thank you
Miguel
> return 0;
> }
> if (handler && handler->hotplug.scan_dependent)
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-24 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-20 18:47 Russell King
2023-10-24 10:15 ` Miguel Luis [this message]
2023-10-24 11:28 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-10-24 11:38 ` Miguel Luis
2023-10-24 12:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5589E5A5-9F97-416A-9C48-9828B0BE58CD@oracle.com \
--to=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®