On 07/06/2015 12:23 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Sasha Levin wrote: > >> On 07/06/2015 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>> * Sasha Levin wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Ingo, >>>> >>>> I've started seeing the fuzzer hitting the BUG() at arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533. git >>>> blame pointed to this patch. I know that you didn't see any changes in the compiled >>>> file in your testcase, but I do see changes in mine. >>> >>> Hm, weird - could you send me your .config please? >> >> Attached. > > It's still weird: I copied your config to 4d7321381e5c and made 'make oldconfig' - > and it asked a couple of questions, which suggests that your config does not come > from 4d7321381e5c? Right, sorry, this is my base config for -next. I just did 'yes "" | make oldconfig' for the build test. I've attached it. > Furthermore, building 4d7321381e5c and 4d7321381e5c^1 gives me: > > # arch/x86/entry/entry_64.o: > > text data bss dec hex filename > 11530 0 0 11530 2d0a entry_64.o.before > 11530 0 0 11530 2d0a entry_64.o.after > > md5: > 1430e793250d5d8572bc2df2997d3929 entry_64.o.before.asm > 1430e793250d5d8572bc2df2997d3929 entry_64.o.after.asm > > i.e. I have trouble reproducing the discrepancy you are seeing. (I also tried > allmodconfig/allyesconfig again for good measure - no luck.) With allyesconfig I don't actually see a change. Only with the config I've attached. Thanks, Sasha