mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
To: Paul Osmialowski <p.osmialowsk@samsung.com>,
	Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@googlemail.com>,
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@opendz.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@samsung.com>,
	Lukasz Skalski <l.skalski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/8] kdbus: use LSM hooks in kdbus code
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:56:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559FF920.2020302@tycho.nsa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559D27AB.4010402@tycho.nsa.gov>

On 07/08/2015 09:37 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On 07/08/2015 06:25 AM, Paul Osmialowski wrote:
>> Originates from:
>>
>> https://github.com/lmctl/kdbus.git (branch: kdbus-lsm-v4.for-systemd-v212)
>> commit: aa0885489d19be92fa41c6f0a71df28763228a40
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Osmialowski <p.osmialowsk@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  ipc/kdbus/bus.c        | 12 ++++++++++-
>>  ipc/kdbus/bus.h        |  3 +++
>>  ipc/kdbus/connection.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  ipc/kdbus/connection.h |  4 ++++
>>  ipc/kdbus/domain.c     |  9 ++++++++-
>>  ipc/kdbus/domain.h     |  2 ++
>>  ipc/kdbus/endpoint.c   | 11 ++++++++++
>>  ipc/kdbus/names.c      | 11 ++++++++++
>>  ipc/kdbus/queue.c      | 30 ++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  9 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>>
> 
>> diff --git a/ipc/kdbus/connection.c b/ipc/kdbus/connection.c
>> index 9993753..b85cdc7 100644
>> --- a/ipc/kdbus/connection.c
>> +++ b/ipc/kdbus/connection.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>>  #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>>  #include <linux/uio.h>
>> +#include <linux/security.h>
>>  
>>  #include "bus.h"
>>  #include "connection.h"
>> @@ -73,6 +74,8 @@ static struct kdbus_conn *kdbus_conn_new(struct kdbus_ep *ep, bool privileged,
>>  	bool is_activator;
>>  	bool is_monitor;
>>  	struct kvec kvec;
>> +	u32 sid, len;
>> +	char *label;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>>  	struct {
>> @@ -222,6 +225,14 @@ static struct kdbus_conn *kdbus_conn_new(struct kdbus_ep *ep, bool privileged,
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	security_task_getsecid(current, &sid);
>> +	security_secid_to_secctx(sid, &label, &len);
>> +	ret = security_kdbus_connect(conn, label, len);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		ret = -EPERM;
>> +		goto exit_unref;
>> +	}
> 
> This seems convoluted and expensive.  If you always want the label of
> the current task here, then why not just have security_kdbus_connect()
> internally extract the label of the current task?
> 
>> @@ -1107,6 +1119,12 @@ static int kdbus_conn_reply(struct kdbus_conn *src, struct kdbus_kmsg *kmsg)
>>  	if (ret < 0)
>>  		goto exit;
>>  
>> +	ret = security_kdbus_talk(src, dst);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		ret = -EPERM;
>> +		goto exit;
>> +	}
> 
> Where does kdbus apply its uid-based or other restrictions on
> connections?  Why do we need to insert separate hooks into each of these
> functions?  Is there no central chokepoint already for permission
> checking that we can hook?

For example, why wouldn't you insert a single hook into
kdbus_conn_policy_talk() where they perform their DAC checking?
You would need to restructure it slightly to ensure that the security
hook is only called if it passes the DAC (privileged || uid_eq) check so
that we do not trigger MAC denials when DAC wouldn't have allowed it
anyway.  Also, kdbus_conn_policy_talk() takes a separate conn_creds
argument - that should be passed through to the hook as well.



  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-10 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 10:25 [RFC 0/8] Introduce LSM to KDBUS Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-08 10:25 ` [RFC 1/8] lsm: make security_file_receive available for external modules Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-08 10:25 ` [RFC 2/8] lsm: smack: Make ipc/kdbus includes visible so smack callbacks could see them Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-08 16:43   ` Daniel Mack
2015-07-08 10:25 ` [RFC 3/8] lsm: kdbus security hooks Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-08 11:00   ` Lukasz Pawelczyk
2015-07-08 14:14   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-07-08 10:25 ` [RFC 4/8] lsm: smack: smack callbacks for " Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-08 13:42   ` Stephen Smalley
2015-07-08 16:38     ` Casey Schaufler
2015-07-08 20:07       ` Paul Moore
2015-07-09 10:08   ` Sergei Zviagintsev
2015-07-09 15:24     ` Casey Schaufler
2015-07-08 10:25 ` [RFC 5/8] kdbus: use LSM hooks in kdbus code Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-08 11:06   ` Lukasz Pawelczyk
2015-07-08 11:09   ` Lukasz Pawelczyk
2015-07-08 12:12     ` Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-09 10:55       ` Sergei Zviagintsev
2015-07-09 11:28         ` Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-08 13:37   ` Stephen Smalley
2015-07-10 16:56     ` Stephen Smalley [this message]
2015-07-10 18:20     ` Stephen Smalley
2015-07-08 14:13   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-07-08 16:24   ` Casey Schaufler
2015-07-08 10:25 ` [RFC 6/8] kdbus: TEST_CREATE_CONN now does no depend on TEST_CREATE_BUS Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-08 10:25 ` [RFC 7/8] kdbus: selftests extended Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-08 10:25 ` [RFC 8/8] kdbus: Ability to run kdbus test by executable binary name Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-08 14:16   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-07-08 14:58     ` Paul Osmialowski
2015-07-08 16:46 ` [RFC 0/8] Introduce LSM to KDBUS Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559FF920.2020302@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --to=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=daniel@zonque.org \
    --cc=dh.herrmann@googlemail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
    --cc=k.lewandowsk@samsung.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=l.skalski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.d.rustad@intel.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=p.osmialowsk@samsung.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=tixxdz@opendz.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome