From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754948AbbG1FmT (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 01:42:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:34610 "EHLO mail-wi0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751709AbbG1FmR (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 01:42:17 -0400 Reply-To: monstr@monstr.eu Subject: Re: [RFCv2 2/3] dts: zynq: Add devicetree entry for Xilinx Zynq reset controller. References: <1437783682-13632-1-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <1437783682-13632-3-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <55B5D62D.4010407@monstr.eu> To: Moritz Fischer Cc: p.zabel@pengutronix.de, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, Michal Simek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel , Kumar Gala , =?UTF-8?Q?S=c3=b6ren_Brinkmann?= , Nicolas Ferre From: Michal Simek Message-ID: <55B71633.8060608@monstr.eu> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:42:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cgsmT1LuciCO1qK8qnetbc9w1Nr4luQ9U" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --cgsmT1LuciCO1qK8qnetbc9w1Nr4luQ9U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/28/2015 07:03 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote: > Hi Michal, >=20 > I agree we need to be careful with changing the bindings. >=20 > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Michal Simek wrote= : >> Hi Moritz, >> >> On 07/25/2015 02:21 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 43 ++++++++++++- >> >> This patch is nice in general but every change in binding should be >> discussed separately. There is also necessary to wire them up in the >> driver to do action. That's why I think that will be the best just to >> add the code to slcr and keep others untouched. >=20 > Ok, just to clarify: You'd suggest to just add the rstc as child node > to the slcr, > and leave the other nodes untouched? yes and then add it on case-by-case basis. Thanks, Michal --=20 Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform --cgsmT1LuciCO1qK8qnetbc9w1Nr4luQ9U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlW3FjMACgkQykllyylKDCEQPQCeN5vW2E2Z24ap+cMj6Ur4JZw7 J9gAoIi/L4NjY8HLaVCJHCQMRq7t9gvg =DNmv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cgsmT1LuciCO1qK8qnetbc9w1Nr4luQ9U--