From: Andrea Scian <rnd4@dave-tech.it>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: use nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk in default ECC read functions
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:07:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BB48D9.6050508@dave-tech.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438277694-23763-3-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Dear Boris,
Il 30/07/2015 19:34, Boris Brezillon ha scritto:
> The default NAND read functions are relying on an underlying controller
> to correct bitflips, but some of those controller cannot properly fix
> bitflips in erased pages.
> In case of ECC failures, check if the page of subpage is empty before
> reporting an ECC failure.
I'm still wondering if chip->ecc.strength is the right threshold.
Did you see my comments here [1]? WDYT?
Maybe we can have this discussion in a separate thread, if you want ;-)
Kind Regards,
--
Andrea SCIAN
DAVE Embedded Systems
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-July/060520.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index 1542ea7..d527c73 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -1396,6 +1396,19 @@ static int nand_read_subpage(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> stat = chip->ecc.correct(mtd, p,
> &chip->buffers->ecccode[i], &chip->buffers->ecccalc[i]);
> if (stat < 0) {
> + /* check for empty pages with bitflips */
> + int col = (int)(p - bufpoi);
> +
> + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RNDOUT, col, -1);
> + chip->read_buf(mtd, p, chip->ecc.size);
> + stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, chip->ecc.size,
> + &chip->buffers->ecccode[i],
> + chip->ecc.bytes,
> + NULL, 0,
> + chip->ecc.strength);
> + }
> +
> + if (stat < 0) {
> mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> } else {
> mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;
> @@ -1445,6 +1458,16 @@ static int nand_read_page_hwecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
>
> stat = chip->ecc.correct(mtd, p, &ecc_code[i], &ecc_calc[i]);
> if (stat < 0) {
> + /* check for empty pages with bitflips */
> + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RNDOUT, i, -1);
> + chip->read_buf(mtd, p, eccsize);
> + stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize,
> + &ecc_code[i], eccbytes,
> + NULL, 0,
> + chip->ecc.strength);
> + }
> +
> + if (stat < 0) {
> mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> } else {
> mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;
> @@ -1495,7 +1518,18 @@ static int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> chip->read_buf(mtd, p, eccsize);
> chip->ecc.calculate(mtd, p, &ecc_calc[i]);
>
> - stat = chip->ecc.correct(mtd, p, &ecc_code[i], NULL);
> + stat = chip->ecc.correct(mtd, p, &ecc_code[i], &ecc_calc[i]);
> + if (stat < 0) {
> + /* check for empty pages with bitflips */
> + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RNDOUT,
> + i + mtd->oobsize, -1);
> + chip->read_buf(mtd, p, eccsize);
> + stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize,
> + &ecc_code[i], eccbytes,
> + NULL, 0,
> + chip->ecc.strength);
> + }
> +
> if (stat < 0) {
> mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> } else {
> @@ -1523,6 +1557,8 @@ static int nand_read_page_syndrome(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size;
> int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
> int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
> + int eccstepsize = eccsize + eccbytes + chip->ecc.prepad +
> + chip->ecc.postpad;
> uint8_t *p = buf;
> uint8_t *oob = chip->oob_poi;
> unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
> @@ -1542,19 +1578,30 @@ static int nand_read_page_syndrome(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> chip->read_buf(mtd, oob, eccbytes);
> stat = chip->ecc.correct(mtd, p, oob, NULL);
>
> - if (stat < 0) {
> - mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> - } else {
> - mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;
> - max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);
> - }
> -
> oob += eccbytes;
>
> if (chip->ecc.postpad) {
> chip->read_buf(mtd, oob, chip->ecc.postpad);
> oob += chip->ecc.postpad;
> }
> +
> + if (stat < 0) {
> + /* check for empty pages with bitflips */
> + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RNDOUT, i * eccstepsize, -1);
> + chip->read_buf(mtd, p, chip->ecc.size);
> + stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, chip->ecc.size,
> + oob - eccstepsize,
> + eccstepsize,
> + NULL, 0,
> + chip->ecc.strength);
> + }
> +
> + if (stat < 0) {
> + mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> + } else {
> + mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;
> + max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);
> + }
> }
>
> /* Calculate remaining oob bytes */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-31 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-30 17:34 [RFC PATCH 0/2] mtd: nand: properly handle bitflips in erased pages Boris Brezillon
2015-07-30 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: add nand_check_erased helper functions Boris Brezillon
2015-07-31 7:10 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-31 10:06 ` Andrea Scian
2015-07-31 10:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-31 13:29 ` Andrea Scian
2015-07-31 13:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-08-04 15:42 ` Andrea Scian
2015-08-04 16:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-30 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: use nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk in default ECC read functions Boris Brezillon
2015-07-31 10:07 ` Andrea Scian [this message]
2015-07-31 10:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-31 13:40 ` Andrea Scian
2015-07-31 14:10 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-31 16:19 ` Andrea Scian
2015-07-31 16:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-08-03 11:16 ` Andrea Scian
2015-08-03 12:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-08-03 13:39 ` Andrea Scian
2015-08-03 19:32 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-04 7:02 ` Andrea Scian
2015-08-04 7:21 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-06 4:28 ` Andrea Scian
2015-08-06 9:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-08-06 9:42 ` Richard Weinberger
[not found] <mailman.4514.1438332781.1758.linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
[not found] <mailman.4457.1438277726.1758.linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55BB48D9.6050508@dave-tech.it \
--to=rnd4@dave-tech.it \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome