From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754747AbbHFJma (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 05:42:30 -0400 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:65275 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751717AbbHFJm3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 05:42:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: use nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk in default ECC read functions To: Boris Brezillon References: <1438277694-23763-3-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <55BB48D9.6050508@dave-tech.it> <20150731123221.34cf601e@bbrezillon> <55BB7ABD.7040008@dave-tech.it> <20150731161032.2b155ccb@bbrezillon> <55BBA012.4080600@dave-tech.it> <20150731182709.14c345df@bbrezillon> <55BF4D72.8090000@dave-tech.it> <20150803144253.66fc6941@bbrezillon> <55BF6F09.9000001@dave-tech.it> <55BFC1DA.3090108@nod.at> <55C06379.5090705@dave-tech.it> <55C067F7.3000309@nod.at> <20150806111901.3d2d5494@bbrezillon> Cc: Andrea Scian , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Han Xu , Artem Bityutskiy From: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <55C32BFF.6020802@nod.at> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:42:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150806111901.3d2d5494@bbrezillon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 06.08.2015 um 11:19 schrieb Boris Brezillon: >> I think this needs more discussion. >> >> Boris, Brian, will you be at Embedded Linux Conference Europe in Dublin? >> Maybe we can discuss these issues (data retention, ff-checks, etc...) in person and figure out where to address them. >> I really want to avoid ad-hoc solutions. :) > > I'll be at ELCE and I'd be happy to discuss all these NAND/MTD/UBI > related issues with you, though I think we should keep discussing > those problems on the ML too. Sure, I did not recommend a secret meeting. ;-) But often a face to face conversation is better for brain storming. Thanks, //richard