From: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: mdio: mux-gpio: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 13:40:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55bba029-9243-439d-9f1c-985f48ad2ec8@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4899393-f465-4139-ac3d-8e652c4dd1dc@lunn.ch>
On 6/11/25 1:25 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 01:11:36PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
>> Reduce verbosity by using gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep() instead of
>> gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep().
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>> This is a resend of a patch from the series "[PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib:
>> add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep" [1].
>>
>> This patch never got acked so didn't go picked up with the rest of that
>> series. The dependency has been in mainline since v6.15-rc1 so this
>> patch can now be applied independently.
>
> It is not surprising it did not get picked up when it is mixed in with
> a lot of other subsystems. Please always post a patchset per
> subsystem.
>
> This also appears to be version 4.
>
> Since you did not annotate the Subject: line with the tree this is
> for, i'm not sure the CI system will accept it an run the tests.
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20250611-net-mdio-mux-gpio-use-gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep-v1-1-6eb5281f1b41@baylibre.com/
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>
> Andrew
OK, I will try again tomorrow with [PATCH net-next v5].
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 18:11 David Lechner
2025-06-11 18:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-06-11 18:40 ` David Lechner [this message]
2025-06-11 20:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-13 1:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55bba029-9243-439d-9f1c-985f48ad2ec8@baylibre.com \
--to=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®