From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
dietmar.eggeman@arm.com, mgorman@techsingularity.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] sched: introduce task_se_h_load helper
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:52:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55d914d2-fba2-48c0-e7ff-3c7337c8cf8e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612193227.993-2-riel@surriel.com>
On 6/12/19 9:32 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Sometimes the hierarchical load of a sched_entity needs to be calculated.
> Split out task_h_load into a task_se_h_load that takes a sched_entity pointer
> as its argument, and a task_h_load wrapper that calls task_se_h_load.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index f35930f5e528..df624f7a68e7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -706,6 +706,7 @@ static u64 sched_vslice(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int cpu);
> +static unsigned long task_se_h_load(struct sched_entity *se);
> static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p);
> static unsigned long capacity_of(int cpu);
>
> @@ -7833,14 +7834,19 @@ static void update_cfs_rq_h_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> }
> }
>
> -static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p)
> +static unsigned long task_se_h_load(struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> - struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(p);
> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>
> update_cfs_rq_h_load(cfs_rq);
> - return div64_ul(p->se.avg.load_avg * cfs_rq->h_load,
> + return div64_ul(se->avg.load_avg * cfs_rq->h_load,
> cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq) + 1);
> }
I wonder if this is necessary. I placed a BUG_ON(!entity_is_task(se))
into task_se_h_load() after I applied the whole patch-set and ran some
taskgroup related testcases. It didn't hit.
So why not use task_h_load(task_of(se)) instead?
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-19 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 19:32 [RFC] sched,cfs: flatten CPU controller runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-06-12 19:32 ` [PATCH 1/8] sched: introduce task_se_h_load helper Rik van Riel
2019-06-19 12:52 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2019-06-19 13:57 ` Rik van Riel
2019-06-19 15:18 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-19 15:55 ` Rik van Riel
2019-06-12 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched: change /proc/sched_debug fields Rik van Riel
2019-06-12 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched,fair: redefine runnable_load_avg as the sum of task_h_load Rik van Riel
2019-06-18 9:08 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-26 14:34 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-12 19:32 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched,fair: remove cfs rqs from leaf_cfs_rq_list bottom up Rik van Riel
2019-06-12 19:32 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched,cfs: use explicit cfs_rq of parent se helper Rik van Riel
2019-06-20 16:23 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-20 16:29 ` Rik van Riel
2019-06-24 11:24 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-26 15:58 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-26 16:15 ` Rik van Riel
2019-06-12 19:32 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched,cfs: fix zero length timeslice calculation Rik van Riel
2019-06-12 19:32 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched,fair: refactor enqueue/dequeue_entity Rik van Riel
2019-06-12 19:32 ` [PATCH 8/8] sched,fair: flatten hierarchical runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-06-25 9:50 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-25 13:51 ` Rik van Riel
2019-06-28 10:26 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-28 19:36 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55d914d2-fba2-48c0-e7ff-3c7337c8cf8e@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggeman@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome