From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Rachel Kim <rachel.kim@atmel.com>,
Chris Park <chris.park@atmel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@atmel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Tony Cho <tony.cho@atmel.com>, Leo Kim <leo.kim@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wicl1000: fix dereference after free in wilc_wlan_cleanup()
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:04:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560151D1.40606@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150922121600.GA16336@sudip-pc>
Hello Sudip,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On 09/22/2015 02:16 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:24:50PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The wilc_wlan_cleanup() function iterates over the list of transmission
>> buffers freeing all of them and then iterates over the receive buffers
>> list to free all of them as well.
>>
>> But on the receive loop a pointer to struct txq_entry_t is dereferenced
>> instead of the pointer to a struct rxq_entry_t. This not only causes a
>> dereference to a pointer already freed but also leaks the memory in the
>> struct rxq_entry_t buffer.
>>
>> Fixes: c5c77ba18ea6 ("staging: wilc1000: Add SDIO/SPI 802.11 driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
>> index 4c25179c2fec..c40f143b00b7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
>> @@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ static void wilc_wlan_cleanup(void)
>> if (rqe == NULL)
>> break;
>> #ifdef MEMORY_DYNAMIC
>> - kfree(tqe->buffer);
>> + kfree(rqe->buffer);
>> #endif
> MEMORY_DYNAMIC is only used here and no where else. And buffer was
> allocated in the else part of #ifdef MEMORY_STATIC.
> So you should really be using #ifndef MEMORY_STATIC here instead of
> #ifdef MEMORY_DYNAMIC otherwise memory leak will still remain.
>
You are right that #ifndef MEMORY_STATIC should be used instead to fix
the memory leak. I'll post a v2 changing that as well.
> regards
> sudip
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-22 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 10:24 Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-09-22 12:16 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-09-22 13:04 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560151D1.40606@osg.samsung.com \
--to=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=chris.park@atmel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johnny.kim@atmel.com \
--cc=leo.kim@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rachel.kim@atmel.com \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.cho@atmel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®