mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org
Subject: Re: next-20130117 - kernel BUG with aio
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 10:53:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5602.1360079580@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:37:27 -0800." <20130201003727.GK12631@moria.home.lan>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2021 bytes --]

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:37:27 -0800, Kent Overstreet said:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:59:52PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Did this get fixed?

> With the patches I sent you, yes - not seeing a new linux-next tree yet?

Well, it's a mixed bag at my end.  Finally got a chance to do some more
testing, and:

1) next-20130128 didn't show anything in dmesg, but my VirtualBox Windows 7
images appear to livelock on the way up - the Windows throbber would keep
going, but it never made any actual progress towards booting. (Part of the
delay was fixing a next-20121224 environment, and then discovering it
took Windows *two* reboot cycles to get its act back together after getting
into that hung state).

2_ next-20130128 plus the following 3 patches:

Subject: [PATCH 1/3] aio: Fix a null pointer deref in batch_complete_aio
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] aio-use-cancellation-list-lazily-fix
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] aio-kill-ki_retry-fix-fix

VirtualBox appears to be functional (I did 2 complete boot/shutdown
sequences of both a 32-bit and 64-bit Win7 Enterprise image). *HOWEVER*,
I saw 3 of these in dmesg:

[  668.278624] WARNING: at fs/aio.c:348 put_ioctx+0x1c0/0x241()

[  668.278652] Call Trace:
[  668.278660]  [<ffffffff8102ed10>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0x96
[  668.278665]  [<ffffffff8102edc9>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x17
[  668.278669]  [<ffffffff8114c562>] put_ioctx+0x1c0/0x241
[  668.278673]  [<ffffffff8114d42a>] sys_io_destroy+0x4c/0x5c
[  668.278679]  [<ffffffff8160c112>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

and the code there says:

        WARN_ON(atomic_read(&ctx->reqs_available) > ctx->nr);

which leaves me wondering exactly how we exited the while loop
just above - is the intention that it loop until reqs_available == ctx->nr
exactly?  Looks like if 'avail' is anything other than exactly 1 in
that while loop, we can be at a state where reqs_avail == (ctx->nr -1),
get 'avail=2', do the atomic_add, fall out of the loop, and trigger
the WARN_ON.

Damned if I see how that can happen though....








[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 865 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-05 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-21 13:24 Valdis Kletnieks
2013-01-22 13:43 ` Hillf Danton
2013-01-22 21:28   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2013-01-23 12:10     ` Hillf Danton
2013-01-24 17:22       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2013-01-24 21:18         ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-24 21:27           ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-24 21:39             ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-24 22:25               ` Zach Brown
2013-01-24 22:47                 ` Jeff Moyer
2013-01-24 23:03                 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-24 22:13             ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-29 13:41               ` Jan Kara
2013-01-24 21:43           ` [PATCH 1/3] aio: Fix a null pointer deref in batch_complete_aio Kent Overstreet
2013-01-25 13:15             ` Hillf Danton
2013-01-24 21:43           ` [PATCH 2/3] aio-kill-ki_retry-fix-fix Kent Overstreet
2013-01-24 21:43           ` [PATCH 3/3] aio-use-cancellation-list-lazily-fix Kent Overstreet
2013-01-25 13:30             ` Hillf Danton
2013-01-25 23:12               ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-28 17:37                 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-31 21:59     ` next-20130117 - kernel BUG with aio Andrew Morton
2013-02-01  0:37       ` Kent Overstreet
2013-02-05 15:53         ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2013-02-05 17:20           ` Kent Overstreet
2013-02-05 17:48             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2013-02-06 17:15             ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5602.1360079580@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
    --to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=koverstreet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®