mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: "Sean O. Stalley" <sean.stalley@intel.com>
Cc: "David Daney" <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
	rajatxjain@gmail.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com,
	"David Daney" <david.daney@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: Add support for Enhanced Allocation devices
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:01:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560C69BF.6000205@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150930225011.GA4244@sean.stalley.intel.com>

On 09/30/2015 03:50 PM, Sean O. Stalley wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 04:53:20PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>> On 09/29/2015 03:47 PM, Sean O. Stalley wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>>>>>> index 6a9a111..7c60b16 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>>>>>> @@ -2148,6 +2148,284 @@ void pci_pm_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>>>>   	}
>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static unsigned long pci_ea_set_flags(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 prop)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +	unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED | IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN;
>>>>>
>>>>> Why did you add the IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN flag? EA allows for unaligned resources.
>>>>
>>>> pci_bus_assign_resources() fails causing the devices to be unusable
>>>> if resource_alignment() returns zero.  The easiest fix for this was
>>>> to specify IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN.
>>>>
>>>> An alternative would be to change the code in setup-bus.c so that
>>>> for IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED resources, it didn't barf.
>>>
>>> I would do this alternative, but with a IORESOURCE_PCI_EA flag.
>>>
>>
>> I don't think we need IORESOURCE_PCI_EA.  If a resource is tagged as
>> IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED that means that it cannot be changed, we
>> shouldn't care why it is fixed (due to an EA capability for
>> example).  We just need to gracefully handle IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED in
>> the places where things currently go wrong.
>>
>> David Daney
>>
>
> I agree that we need to make sure fixed things stay fixed,
> regardless of if they are fixed by EA or something else.
>
> The question is: do we want to allow all fixed resources to be non-aligned, or just EA?

The alignment should only be important if a new address is being 
calculated for a BAR or behind the bridge memory/io region.  If the 
resource is fixed, I would almost say that "alignment" is an undefined 
concept.  So, in the places were we need special treatment for 
IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED, I would argue that we shouldn't be use the 
resource alignment information.

David Daney

>
> -Sean
>


      reply	other threads:[~2015-09-30 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-29  0:10 [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI: Add support for PCI Enhanced Allocation "BARs" David Daney
2015-09-29  0:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Add Enhanced Allocation register entries David Daney
2015-09-29  0:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: Add support for Enhanced Allocation devices David Daney
2015-09-29 19:27   ` Sean O. Stalley
2015-09-29 20:25     ` David Daney
2015-09-29 22:47       ` Sean O. Stalley
2015-09-29 23:53         ` David Daney
2015-09-30 22:50           ` Sean O. Stalley
2015-09-30 23:01             ` David Daney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=560C69BF.6000205@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
    --cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=rajatxjain@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean.stalley@intel.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome