From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: kernel test robot <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
Cc: lkp@01.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 19:44:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56165701.90402@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871td6xcxc.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
On 10/08/2015 11:21 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> commit 7494b07ebaae2117629024369365f7be7adc16c3 ("ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro")
>
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: undefined MADT subtable type for FADT 4.0: 127 (length 12)
Seems that the MADT table contains reserved subtable type (0x7F),
so this is traded as a wrong type in our patch.
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: Error parsing LAPIC address override entry
This was called by early_acpi_parse_madt_lapic_addr_ovr() in
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c, which is scanning MADT for the first
time when booting, so it will fail the boot process when finding
the reserved MADT subtable type.
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: Invalid BIOS MADT, disabling ACPI
As the spec said in Table 5-46 (ACPI 6.0):
0x10-0x7F Reserved. OSPM skips structures of the reserved type.
Should we just ignore those reserved type when scanning the MADT
table? In the patch "ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to
eventually replace the macro", we just trade it as wrong, that's
why we failed to boot the system.
Thanks
Hanjun
next parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-08 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <871td6xcxc.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
2015-10-08 11:44 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-10-08 16:36 ` Al Stone
2015-10-08 20:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-08 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-08 20:32 ` Al Stone
2015-10-08 22:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-08 23:05 ` Al Stone
2015-10-09 21:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-09 22:52 ` Al Stone
2015-10-09 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56165701.90402@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome