From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-10628.protonmail.ch (mail-10628.protonmail.ch [79.135.106.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11415432317; Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.135.106.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785509345; cv=none; b=ttwzFwWnyEi4GH3etiMXec3pbpaC9/xSCGs0OEAG6h4MQzOZlYD7qAWlCjqBpy4aCL97zMUIk14gYaYT/0QDGJkkvJGnCHBtQsn66LpzucsDK0cGmRIaBjY6jGIC0sRHtukG6Hjza8knq+98z2qaVeIPn8kQYQtMRif6BKYdkS4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785509345; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nmb4mCgvryFrwNA2mwZKsK8uMaWetaN8jhYb7byYB5g=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JWTamROOJ6nZ+cNS0ZzJWj47LUr0Fl2DhG+izC/EO07l3dcn/BoIMp4+PofO500WDUQF7WsN2eTTGwP0UHqkt7oMSjKmnTtCPARV1ExS+ZPf/DnSUk9PKHIr/5Rd230+1fwxj8qsXuAT8V6m18UZK17ZvP0ettoHnL8g7Th7D7o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b=ii74OcCx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.135.106.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b="ii74OcCx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=lwe32szhdba3zjd6qy5f25tcxm.protonmail; t=1785509333; x=1785768533; bh=nmb4mCgvryFrwNA2mwZKsK8uMaWetaN8jhYb7byYB5g=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=ii74OcCxTqNUwOeEg/8dfA5CdcanGsk0hrqWrhQWS1cAQi/9fLpv00TKze2reydfj KLBfYJ7NSuJTLQqYBRqPobcDaqy9KskWDXhwyocvq5vK24CHKfw7AIvmCwsZ73oD+x QeAen0xVPjtABKpImNcw0ME0J8vtCD53ms7CHgNPs1lq2oGQcFbsyYp2xwdKV53J5+ WceDlZAtc+JzCiW9hpT2T5G+FnRbKe4zrwJfspjGlfAjdkB9xftfd5DcMq1SxZPUpc X8oPzWtHj/y+4jmvBjosqsJ8SPfZoAyTEebfsoL9yjOueIY0R408Mf9tp6JRaHT5rR KOACRTFhPpqPw== Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:48:47 +0000 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski From: Esteban Urrutia Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heikki Krogerus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: typec: ucsi: ucsi_glink: Add compatible string for SM8475 Message-ID: <562c2302-34f6-4d2c-b60e-39726601ba7a@proton.me> In-Reply-To: <20260731-light-kelpie-of-will-8b71bb@quoll> References: <20260731-sm8475-pmic-glink-v2-0-28c04928ef22@proton.me> <20260731-sm8475-pmic-glink-v2-2-28c04928ef22@proton.me> <20260731-light-kelpie-of-will-8b71bb@quoll> Feedback-ID: 147889766:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 3d0f6338d01d99fb3dbcd1ea68e555399928b881 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 7/31/26 5:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Really, you just wrote IT IS DIFFERENT in the bindings, so how can it be = the same data? No. I said "different process design", not that they were different. Other SoCs also use older data despite being newer, such as QCM6490 which uses SC8280XP data. Regards, Esteban