From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Stas Sergeev <stsp@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: 4.3 regression: task_work corruption in vm86 mode?
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:50:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5634AB0E.3060707@list.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWUmL5bPyxR0gvchtn433hdnSqOuRdBjFsqJqa_xbtBnw@mail.gmail.com>
31.10.2015 08:43, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>> Hi all-
>>
>> In 4.3-rc7, running dosemu2 (https://github.com/stsp/dosemu2/) oopses
>> the system very quickly, as long as CONFIG_VM86=y. It blows up
>> because snd_seq_delete_port walks ports_list_head, finds two valid
>> ports, and then starts finding obviously invalid pointers in the list.
>>
>> git bisect blames:
>>
>> commit 5ed92a8ab71f8865ba07811429c988c72299b315
>> Author: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed Jul 29 01:41:19 2015 -0400
>>
>> x86/vm86: Use the normal pt_regs area for vm86
>>
>> I haven't spotted the problem yet. It seems to happen when
>> task_work_run fires in get_signal, which happens before
>> save_v86_state. I'm not entirely sure what causes task work to be
>> scheduled at all while in v86 land. Could we somehow be processing
>> task_work later than we should?
>>
> Nope, the bug has nothing to do with task_work. Patches sent.
Andy, thanks for finally fixing this attack surface!
So after all, the comments you put into Kconfig, were justified.
Now I can seriously consider the dosemu2-specific vm86-light.
Having the machine to crash, was not a good starting point for
the clean-ups.
Also there is an interesting thread here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1499089
I wonder if they are affected now by that bug or not...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-31 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-31 1:44 Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-31 5:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-31 11:50 ` Stas Sergeev [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5634AB0E.3060707@list.ru \
--to=stsp@list.ru \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=stsp@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome