From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>
Cc: daveti@purdue.edu, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix slab-use-after-free in l2cap_send_cmd
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:24:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5639ab86-2d12-45ce-864c-80fbc0c79094@moroto.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJNyHp+eCq1p_gTbxAJBKouAw-oQ=j5xwyjk5o-91pf_hGdrAg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 05:35:01AM -0400, Sungwoo Kim wrote:
> > > +
> > > return chan;
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > This doesn't fix the bug because we're returning chan.
> >
> > As soon as you call l2cap_chan_put() then chan will be freed by in the
> > other thread which is doing l2cap_conn_del() resulting in a use after
> > free in the caller.
>
> Thank you for pointing this out.
> No caller uses the return value of l2cap_connect() if the kernel
> versions >= v6.9.
> So, l2cap_connect() can return void.
>
> One caller uses the return value of l2cap_connect() in v4.19 <= the
> kernel versions <= v6.8.
> In this case, the caller should unlock and put a channel.
>
> Question: Can different patches be applied for different versions like
> the above?
Ah... Very good. I assumed it was used. The the commit which stopped
using the return value, commit e7b02296fb40 ("Bluetooth: Remove BT_HS"),
has been back ported to earlier kernels as well.
Generally, we just write code against the latest kernel and worry about
backports as a separate issue. We sometimes re-write patches slightly
if that's necessary for the backport.
I'm not an expert in bluetooth, but I think your patch seems correct.
Let's make l2cap_connect() void as well. Wait for a day or two for
other comments and then send a v2 patch.
https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2022/07/27/how-to-send-a-v2-patch/
Here is how you write the commit message:
========================================================================
[PATCH v2] Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix slab-use-after-free in l2cap_connect()
KASAN detected a use after free in l2cap_send_cmd().
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in l2cap_send_cmd+0x5dc/0x830 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:968
[free]
l2cap_conn_del
┌ mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
│ foreach chan in conn->chan_l: ... (2)
│ l2cap_chan_put(chan);
│ l2cap_chan_destroy
│ kfree(chan) ... (3) <-- chan freed
└ mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
[use]
l2cap_bredr_sig_cmd
l2cap_connect
┌ mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
│ chan = pchan->ops->new_connection(pchan); <-- allocates chan
│ __l2cap_chan_add(conn, chan);
│ l2cap_chan_hold(chan);
│ list_add(&chan->list, &conn->chan_l); ... (1)
└ mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
chan->conf_state ... (4) <-- use after free
To fix this, this patch holds and locks the l2cap channel.
Also make the l2cap_connect() return type void. Nothing is using the
returned value but it is ugly to return a potentially freed pointer.
Making it void will help with backports because earlier kernels did use
the return value. Now the compile will break for kernels where this
patch is not a complete fix.
Fixes: 73ffa904b782 ("Bluetooth: Move conf_{req,rsp} stuff to struct l2cap_chan")
Signed-off-by:
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-26 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-26 7:20 Sungwoo Kim
2024-04-26 7:31 ` Sungwoo Kim
2024-04-26 7:55 ` Paul Menzel
2024-04-26 8:25 ` Markus Elfring
2024-04-26 8:38 ` Sungwoo Kim
2024-04-26 9:38 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-04-26 9:48 ` Sungwoo Kim
2024-04-26 10:01 ` Markus Elfring
2024-04-26 9:16 ` [PATCH] " Dan Carpenter
2024-04-26 9:35 ` Sungwoo Kim
2024-04-26 10:24 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5639ab86-2d12-45ce-864c-80fbc0c79094@moroto.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=daveti@purdue.edu \
--cc=iam@sung-woo.kim \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®