mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10 V2] KVM: x86: MMU: Clean up x86's mmu code for future work
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:08:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56448128.1090600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151112204849.ba920599a8426d7196a0df73@lab.ntt.co.jp>



On 12/11/2015 12:48, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> v1->v2:
>   Patch 5 and 7 are added based on Paolo's suggestions.
>   Patch 8-10 are new.
> 
> Patch 1/2/3/4: no change.
> Patch 5: Needed a bit more work than I had expected.
> Patch 6: Removed extra comment of v1 (patch 5 made it inappropriate).
> Patch 7: As expected, many places needed to be converted.
> Patch 8: This is new, but only a small change.
> 
> Patch 9: Kind of an RFC (though I have checked it to some extent).
>   Following two places need to be carefully checked:
>   - in kvm_mmu_get_page: "if (!direct)" block after kvm_mmu_alloc_page()
>   - in FNAME(fetch): "if (FNAME(gpte_changed)(vcpu, gw, it.level - 1))" case
> Patch 10: Trivial cleanup, assuming that patch 9 is correct.
> 
> 
> In summary: patch 1-7 is the result of updating v1 based on the suggestions.
>   Although patch 5 does not look so nice than expected, this is the most
>   conservative approach, and patch 8-10 try to alleviate the sadness.

If it works, it's actually better than what we have now.  I'll review it
in a few days.

Marcelo, can you look at this as well?  You are still king of MMU. :)

Thanks,

Paolo

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-12 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-12 11:48 Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-12 11:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Remove unused parameter of __direct_map() Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-12 11:50 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Add helper function to clear a bit in unsync child bitmap Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-18  2:44   ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-19  0:59     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-19  2:46       ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-19  4:02         ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Make mmu_set_spte() return emulate value Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Remove is_rmap_spte() and use is_shadow_present_pte() Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-12 11:52 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Use for_each_rmap_spte macro instead of pte_list_walk() Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-13 21:47   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-11-14  9:20     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-11-16  2:51       ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-17 17:58         ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-18  3:07   ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-12 11:53 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Consolidate WARN_ON/BUG_ON checks for reverse-mapped sptes Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-13 22:08   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-11-16  3:34     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-12 11:55 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Encapsulate the type of rmap-chain head in a new struct Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-18  3:21   ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-18  9:09     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-19  2:23       ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-12 11:55 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Move initialization of parent_ptes out from kvm_mmu_alloc_page() Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-12 11:56 ` [PATCH 09/10 RFC] KVM: x86: MMU: Move parent_pte handling from kvm_mmu_get_page() to link_shadow_page() Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-12 14:27   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-12 17:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-13  2:15     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-13 10:51       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-18  3:32   ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-12 11:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Remove unused parameter parent_pte from kvm_mmu_get_page() Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-12 12:08 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56448128.1090600@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome