From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752143AbbKQE7M (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:59:12 -0500 Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:36306 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751132AbbKQE7J (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:59:09 -0500 X-AuditID: cbfee68f-f796f6d0000014a4-60-564ab41660ca Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Add support for Exynos SROM Controller driver To: Kukjin Kim , Pavel Fedin References: <1445332540-12814-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <5626DD9A.9030603@samsung.com> <00ba01d10d78$177c1720$46744560$@samsung.com> <562A7A03.8040704@kernel.org> Cc: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, thomas.ab@samsung.com, andi.shyti@samsung.com From: "pankaj.dubey" Message-id: <564AB41E.4090107@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:29:10 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <562A7A03.8040704@kernel.org> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrCIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWyRsSkSldsi1eYwfMJQhbbjzxjtXj9wtCi d8FVNov+x6+ZLTY9vsZqcXnXHDaLGef3MVm8urSKzaJjGaMDp8emVZ1sHpuX1Hv0bVnF6PF5 k1wASxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxswDp1kKHrNXrH69ibGBsY+ti5GTQ0LAROLs7oXMELaYxIV7 68HiQgIrGCUunbWHqWld/RqohgsovpRR4uvqdUwQzndGiTeXdzN2MXJwCAt4Sqw6JQ3SICLg IvFg7zw2iJrtjBIrnu9nB3GYBZ4xShyfN5URpIpNQF9i+uNtYOt4BbQkNt04C2azCKhKLNz/ BKxGVCBCYuKEBlaIGkGJH5PvsYDYnED1Pw7MBFvMLKAncf+iFkiYWUBeYvOat2CXSghcY5dY u7uFHWKmgMS3yYdYQOolBGQlNh2A+lhS4uCKGywTGMVmIdkwC2HqLCRTFzAyr2IUTS1ILihO Si8y1itOzC0uzUvXS87P3cQIjLzT/57172C8e8D6EKMAB6MSD2/DX88wIdbEsuLK3EOMpkBH TGSWEk3OB8Z3Xkm8obGZkYWpiamxkbmlmZI470Kpn8FCAumJJanZqakFqUXxRaU5qcWHGJk4 OKUaGA8rz/kbtzOwWjgr78Juzg2Mbuq7zM6cePR/Fcu/pdsEFW1eP8mYGSF00F/PmCV3Zqnp ep27ghm+z9c/imh3Zbuz995UkTUHOnY+Pnu2rmqiXswzkxXL9n6zLvfay7Sx6+eDIwLu6UaS X3h8/yQeWb7y2o/ob/Lzf/JtNr/5Syv68mkNeY6DFYVKLMUZiYZazEXFiQBOUzTetwIAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrEIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jAV2xLV5hBhf6uCy2H3nGavH6haFF 74KrbBb9j18zW2x6fI3V4vKuOWwWM87vY7J4dWkVm0XHMkYHTo9NqzrZPDYvqffo27KK0ePz JrkAlqgGRpuM1MSU1CKF1Lzk/JTMvHRbJe/geOd4UzMDQ11DSwtzJYW8xNxUWyUXnwBdt8wc oEuUFMoSc0qBQgGJxcVK+naYJoSGuOlawDRG6PqGBMH1GBmggYQ1jBkzD5xmKXjMXrH69SbG BsY+ti5GTg4JAROJ1tWvmSFsMYkL99YDxbk4hASWMkp8Xb2OCcL5zijx5vJuxi5GDg5hAU+J VaekQRpEBFwkHuydB9WwnVFixfP97CAOs8AzRonj86YyglSxCehLTH+8DWwdr4CWxKYbZ8Fs FgFViYX7n4DViApESEyc0MAKUSMo8WPyPRYQmxOo/seBmWCLmQX0JO5f1AIJMwvIS2xe85Z5 AqPALCQdsxCqZiGpWsDIvIpRIrUguaA4KT3XKC+1XK84Mbe4NC9dLzk/dxMjOL6fSe9gPLzL /RCjAAejEg9vw1/PMCHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoivGwrvMKEeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pzUosPMZoCvTGR WUo0OR+YevJK4g2NTcxNjU0tTSxMzCyVxHn1PY3ChATSE0tSs1NTC1KLYPqYODilGhhZbeXV WYx2O8vvkep/61KXtpDF9PAnk93rWNz372Dhej+jse6pktGdrPaDxR8yTofdvlK1QZrHiS3O JbRe64ztqlN7lVI6l77tWPmZY9kMuycz1+w0nGAR2+yaGX407Ocx719FGfc1t7j9rU3Jv7r2 xrQ/5tcLhLuW+zV/O7/tnfUvsZaqNGYlluKMREMt5qLiRACIGhobBQMAAA== DLP-Filter: Pass X-MTR: 20000000000000000@CPGS X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Kukjin On Friday 23 October 2015 11:48 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 10/23/15 18:49, Pavel Fedin wrote: >> Hello! >> >>>> This patchset, I have tested on Peach-Pi (Exynos5880) based chromebook for boot >>>> and S2R functionality. >>>> >>> >>> Entire patchset tested on Trats2 (Exynos4412) board. Unless Kukjin picks >>> it also, I plan to take it for v4.5. >> >> Tested on SMDK5410. By the way, what is current status? If this is final revision, can i post my Ethernet support patchset on top >> of it? >> >> Tested-by: Pavel Fedin >> > Applied, this whole series. > I just pulled your tree, and I can't find these SROM patches in for-next (earlier they were present). Also I can see samsung for-next is pointing to linus/master branch. As this series not landed in linus tree due last moment changes, So do I need to rebase SROM patches on top of latest for-next, and send it once again? Thanks, Pankaj Dubey > Thanks, > Kukjin >